Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

In 2012, the national prevalence of antipsychotic drug use was 20.7% for elderly patients with dementia, with a national incidence of 3.9%. The prevalence ranged from 17.0% to 23.3% in the five regions and from 7.5% to 33.1% in the 98 municipalities, demonstrating an over four-fold difference. The observed geographical variation was more pronounced at municipal level as compared to regional level, suggesting that the variation may be related to variances in clinical practice in primary care. This study highlights an urgent need for further educating professional carers and physicians to guide non-pharmacological as well as pharmacological management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in elderly patients with dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Zakarias, J. K., Jensen‐Dahm, C., Nørgaard, A., Stevnsborg, L., Gasse, C., Andersen, B. G., et al. (2016). Geographical Variation in Antipsychotic Drug Use in Elderly Patients with Dementia: A Nationwide Study. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-160485

Vancouver

Zakarias JK, Jensen‐Dahm C, Nørgaard A, Stevnsborg L, Gasse C, Andersen BG, et al. Geographical Variation in Antipsychotic Drug Use in Elderly Patients with Dementia: A Nationwide Study. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 2016. doi:10.3233/jad-160485. PMID: 27567863.

BibTeX

@article{zakarias2016-27567863,
  author  = {Zakarias, Johanne Købstrup and Jensen‐Dahm, Christina and Nørgaard, Ane and Stevnsborg, Lea and Gasse, Christiane and Andersen, Bodil Gramkow and Jakobsen, Søren and Waldorff, Frans Boch and others},
  title   = {{Geographical Variation in Antipsychotic Drug Use in Elderly Patients with Dementia: A Nationwide Study}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer s Disease},
  year    = {2016},
  doi     = {10.3233/jad-160485},
  pmid    = {27567863},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-160485}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that antipsychotic drug use in elderly patients with dementia varied more than four-fold between municipalities, suggesting differences in clinical practice in primary care. It calls for better education on managing neuropsychiatric symptoms, but it does not test a dementia treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 51/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 51 of 100.51 of 100 points earned49 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer s Disease)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 218 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2016 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 34,536 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 19 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.6 citations a year over 12 year(s) since 2016
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Gunhild Waldemar: h-index 80 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Copenhagen: institution h-index 1,378 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 27567863)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 51 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,223 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,223 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →