Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Mild cognitive impairment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

No disease-modifying therapy is currently available for Alzheimer's disease, but therapies are in development, and one may become available in the near future. Based on results from early-stage clinical trials, therapeutic development has focused on the hypothesis that Alzheimer's dementia must be prevented rather than cured, because candidate treatments have not been able to reverse the course of dementia. Thus, current trials target patients with early-stage Alzheimer's disease. Were a therapy to become available, patients could undergo first screening for signs of early-stage memory loss or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), testing for the Alzheimer's disease pathology, and then treatment with the aim of halting or slowing progression to Alzheimer's dementia. An important health systems challenge will arise if this new treatment paradigm bears out in late-stage clinical trials. In the 28 European Union countries, we estimate that approximately 20 million individuals over age 55 have MCI, although most people have not been tested for disease pathology. Thus, when a therapy first becomes available, there would be a substantial number of existing (or prevalent) MCI patients who would require screening, diagnosis, and then treatment as quickly as possible to prevent the progression to full-blown Alzheimer's dementia. This research analyzes the preparedness of the health care systems in six European countries-France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom-to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment of patients if a disease-modifying therapy for Alzheimer's becomes available.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Low

This analysis argues that because candidate treatments have not reversed dementia, Alzheimer's may need to be prevented rather than cured, with future therapies aimed at early-stage patients such as those with mild cognitive impairment. It estimates about 20 million people over 55 in the EU have mild cognitive impairment and examines whether health systems could handle screening and treatment if such a therapy became available.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Hlavka, J. P., Mattke, S., & Liu, J. L. (2019). Assessing the Preparedness of the Health Care System Infrastructure in Six European Countries for an Alzheimer's Treatment. Rand health quarterly. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr2503

Vancouver

Hlavka JP, Mattke S, Liu JL. Assessing the Preparedness of the Health Care System Infrastructure in Six European Countries for an Alzheimer's Treatment. Rand health quarterly. 2019. doi:10.7249/rr2503. PMID: 31205802.

BibTeX

@article{hlavka2019-31205802,
  author  = {Hlavka, J. P. and Mattke, S. and Liu, J. L.},
  title   = {{Assessing the Preparedness of the Health Care System Infrastructure in Six European Countries for an Alzheimer's Treatment}},
  journal = {Rand health quarterly},
  year    = {2019},
  doi     = {10.7249/rr2503},
  pmid    = {31205802},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.7249/rr2503}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This analysis argues that because candidate treatments have not reversed dementia, Alzheimer's may need to be prevented rather than cured, with future therapies aimed at early-stage patients such as those with mild cognitive impairment. It estimates about 20 million people over 55 in the EU have mild cognitive impairment and examines whether health systems could handle screening and treatment if such a therapy became available.

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 40 of the 93 points it could be judged on, which is 43 of 100. Total 43 of 100.40 of the 93 points we could judge = 43 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 40 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Rand health quarterly)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2019 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 133 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 14.8 citations a year over 9 year(s) since 2019
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 16.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 13 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 42 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Jodi Liu: h-index 19 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 31205802)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 40 / 93 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 40 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100.
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

13 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment from nearby years

Also in Mild cognitive impairment

76 studies in the library are filed under Mild cognitive impairment with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Mild cognitive impairment hub.

Similar studies

More on Mild cognitive impairment

See all studies in Mild cognitive impairment →