Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 56 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Lecanemab was approved for early Alzheimer's disease in Japan, with ≈ 6000 patients treated in the first year post approval. This study explores real-world practices, challenges, and potential solutions. We conducted an anonymized online survey of clinical specialists authorized to prescribe lecanemab, obtaining responses from 311 specialists who collectively treated 3259 patients with lecanemab. A majority of respondents (79%) reported wait times of ≤ 3 months from first consultation to initial infusion. One fourth reported tight outpatient space and staffing and significantly lower capacity of treatment than anticipated. Safety concerns were limited, with amyloid imaging-related abnormality-related interruptions in 3.5%. More than half highly supported additional reimbursement for infusion-related services and insurance coverage for apolipoprotein E (APOE) testing. Early access to lecanemab appears feasible, yet infrastructure and financial hurdles remain. Dedicated reimbursement and insurance coverage for APOE testing may be essential for ensuring safer, more accessible, and sustainable use of this therapy in Japan. Results from an online survey of 311 Japanese specialists prescribing lecanemab in its first year are reported. Majority of wait times from first consultation to initial infusion were 1 to 3 months. Tight affordability of infusion space and staffing was reported by one quarter. Establishing additional medical fee for infusion management was highly expected. Reimbursement of apolipoprotein E test in Japanese health insurance system was also demanded.

Key findings

Why it matters

This survey of 311 Japanese specialists found that early access to lecanemab appears feasible but infrastructure and financial hurdles remain, with one fourth reporting tight outpatient space and staffing. It addresses real-world adoption and reimbursement, not whether the therapy cures or prevents Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 56/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 56 of 100.56 of 100 points earned44 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 6,000 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 16 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 5.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 8.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 16 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Takeshi Iwatsubo: h-index 115 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 The University of Tokyo: institution h-index 1,463 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 11 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41114448)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 56 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Kenichiro, S., Yoshiki, N., Ryoko, I., Atsushi, I., Kiyotaka, N., Tetsuaki, A., et al. (2025). Real-world lecanemab adoption in Japan 1 year after launch: Insights from 311 specialists on infrastructure and reimbursement barriers. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70652

Vancouver

Kenichiro S, Yoshiki N, Ryoko I, Atsushi I, Kiyotaka N, Tetsuaki A, et al. Real-world lecanemab adoption in Japan 1 year after launch: Insights from 311 specialists on infrastructure and reimbursement barriers. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.70652. PMID: 41114448.

BibTeX

@article{kenichiro2025-41114448,
  author  = {Kenichiro, Sato and Yoshiki, Niimi and Ryoko, Ihara and Atsushi, Iwata and Kiyotaka, Nemoto and Tetsuaki, Arai and Shinji, Higashi and Ataru, Igarashi and others},
  title   = {{Real-world lecanemab adoption in Japan 1 year after launch: Insights from 311 specialists on infrastructure and reimbursement barriers}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.70652},
  pmid    = {41114448},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70652}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also in Health systems and care delivery

172 studies in the library are filed under Health systems and care delivery with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Health systems and care delivery hub.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →