Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 34 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract Compared to only 2% of the total population between ages 65 and 84, 15% of persons with dementia (PWD) transition to nursing homes. This may be due to caregiving challenges associated with the behavioral symptoms PWD exhibit and their reduced capacities to perform daily tasks. Access to neighborhood amenities (e.g., parks, food access, libraries, service providers) may reduce the risk of institutionalization by helping PWD maintain their health and independence through the provision of opportunities for physical exercise, nutritious diets, social interaction, and cognitive stimulation while providing their caregivers with supportive services. Using data from the2006-2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the HRS Contextual Data Resource, and the National Neighborhood Data Archive, this study aimed to identify neighborhood factors that are associated with transition into a nursing home among PWD who lived in the community (N=3,366). A series of logistic regression models were estimated adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, health status, and neighborhood characteristics. Findings suggest that access to more park areas, healthy food outlets (i.e., grocery stores, supermarkets, supercenters), social amenities (e.g., museums, libraries), and social services for older adults and those with disabilities (e.g., senior centers, adult day care centers, disability support groups) were significantly associated with a lower risk of 2-year institutionalization. Retail stores and home health services were not significantly associated with the risk of institutionalization. These findings emphasize the importance of neighborhood amenities, such as parks and healthy food outlets, in enabling PWD to age in place.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Choi, Y. J., Fennell, G., & Ailshire, J. (2023). ACCESS TO NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES AND RISK OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION AMONG PERSONS WITH DEMENTIA. Innovation in Aging. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.0165

Vancouver

Choi YJ, Fennell G, Ailshire J. ACCESS TO NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES AND RISK OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION AMONG PERSONS WITH DEMENTIA. Innovation in Aging. 2023. doi:10.1093/geroni/igad104.0165.

BibTeX

@article{choi2023-da9d06ce,
  author  = {Choi, Yeon Jin and Fennell, Gillian and Ailshire, Jennifer},
  title   = {{ACCESS TO NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES AND RISK OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION AMONG PERSONS WITH DEMENTIA}},
  journal = {Innovation in Aging},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1093/geroni/igad104.0165},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.0165}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that access to more parks, healthy food outlets, social amenities, and social services was linked to lower risk of nursing home transition among people with dementia. It suggests neighborhood amenities may help people stay in the community, but it does not test a treatment or cure for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 34/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 34 of 100.34 of 100 points earned66 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Innovation in Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Innovation in Aging: journal h-index 48 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 3,366 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Jennifer Ailshire: h-index 39 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Southern California: institution h-index 1,521 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 34 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,223 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,223 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →