Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 28 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Unwarranted variation in treatment, care and support for people with dementia is well documented. To improve equity of service, in line with the NHS Long Term Plan, it is imperative that we understand how sociodemographic factors affect management and care of dementia. Aim To review published literature between sociodemographic factors and clinical factors, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes for people with dementia. Method We conducted a focused review of published literature between 2000-2021 to outline the evidence describing the relationship between the ten protected characteristics of the Equality Act 2010 and clinical factors, treatment and outcomes in dementia. Other factors such as deprivation, settlement status, education and employment were also explored. Results There is an abundance of published literature on age, race, geographical variation, sex and gender. Evidence is lacking for relationship between disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, religion and belief, sexual orientation, immigration and settlement. Discussion Better understanding of sociodemographic factors of our patient group is key to improving equity of care. This review has identified gaps in knowledge on factors that may affect how patients access care to dementia services.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Wu, K., Vidot, M., Mitchell, J. W., Nitkunan, A., & Carr, G. (2022). 057 Dementia and sociodemographic factors a review. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-abn2.101

Vancouver

Wu K, Vidot M, Mitchell JW, Nitkunan A, Carr G. 057 Dementia and sociodemographic factors a review. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2022. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-abn2.101.

BibTeX

@article{wu2022-7997df61,
  author  = {Wu, Kit and Vidot, Micha and Mitchell, James William and Nitkunan, Arani and Carr, Georgina},
  title   = {{057 Dementia and sociodemographic factors a review}},
  journal = {Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery \& Psychiatry},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.1136/jnnp-2022-abn2.101},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-abn2.101}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review of published literature found abundant research on age, race, geographical variation, sex, and gender in dementia care. Evidence was lacking for relationships between dementia care and disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, religion and belief, sexual orientation, and immigration and settlement.

Study details

How this study scored 28/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 28 of 100.28 of 100 points earned72 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry: journal h-index 336 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 6 year(s) since 2022
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Georgina Carr: h-index 4 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Liverpool: institution h-index 995 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 28 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,223 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,223 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →