Home › Research › Digital health tools
Predicting explainable dementia types with LLM-aided feature engineering
Aditya M Kashyap, Delip Rao, Mary Regina Boland, Li Shen, Chris Callison-Burch. Bioinformatics, 2025-03-29
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
MOTIVATION: The integration of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare has immense potential due to the rapidly growing volume of clinical data. However, existing AI models, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, face significant challenges in terms of explainability and reliability, particularly in high-stakes domains like healthcare. RESULTS: This paper proposes a novel LLM-aided feature engineering approach that enhances interpretability by extracting clinically relevant features from the Oxford Textbook of Medicine. By converting clinical notes into concept vector representations and employing a linear classifier, our method achieved an accuracy of 0.72, outperforming a traditional n-gram Logistic Regression baseline (0.64) and the GPT-4 baseline (0.48), while focusing on high-level clinical features. We also explore using Text Embeddings to reduce the overall time and cost of our approach by 97%. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code relevant to this paper is available at: https://github.com/AdityaKashyap423/Dementia_LLM_Feature_Engineering/tree/main.
Key findings
- However, existing AI models, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, face significant challenges in terms of explainability and reliability, particularly in high-stakes domains like healthcare.
- RESULTS: This paper proposes a novel LLM-aided feature engineering approach that enhances interpretability by extracting clinically relevant features from the Oxford Textbook of Medicine.
- We also explore using Text Embeddings to reduce the overall time and cost of our approach by 97%.
Why it matters
This paper proposes an LLM-aided feature engineering approach to make machine learning predictions of dementia types more explainable, achieving accuracy of 0.72. It is about improving the interpretability of diagnostic models, not about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 45/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Bioinformatics) |
| Journal's citation record | 4 / 4 | Bioinformatics: journal h-index 560 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 2 / 7 | Cited 12 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 2 / 5 | 4.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 3 / 6 | Cited 5.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 1 / 6 | Cited by 1 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 12 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Chris Callison-Burch: h-index 61 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | University of Pennsylvania: institution h-index 1,859 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40199828) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 45 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf156
- PubMed: 40199828
- Original source →
- Free full text: Bioinformatics →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Kashyap, A. M., Rao, D., Boland, M. R., Shen, L., & Callison-Burch, C. (2025). Predicting explainable dementia types with LLM-aided feature engineering. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf156
Vancouver
Kashyap AM, Rao D, Boland MR, Shen L, Callison-Burch C. Predicting explainable dementia types with LLM-aided feature engineering. Bioinformatics. 2025. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf156. PMID: 40199828.
BibTeX
@article{kashyap2025-40199828,
author = {Kashyap, Aditya M and Rao, Delip and Boland, Mary Regina and Shen, Li and Callison-Burch, Chris},
title = {{Predicting explainable dementia types with LLM-aided feature engineering}},
journal = {Bioinformatics},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf156},
pmid = {40199828},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf156}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also tagged “prevalence”
1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.