Enrolment took place between March 2023 and May 2023. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 4,533 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The rs75932628 was associated with AD in the Greek sample. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 16 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Despite differences in CVR management within the countries considered, it was possible to design and implement the HATICE multidomain intervention. 4 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Overall, uptake was lower among men than among women (odds ratio [OR] 0·91 [95% CI 0·88-0·94]; p<0·0001), and higher among older age groups (1·48 [1·42-1·54] among those aged 65-69 years vs those aged 55-59 years; p<0·0001), groups with less deprivation (1·89 [1·76-2·04] for the most vs the least deprived areas; p<0·0001), individuals of Asian ethnicity (1·14 [1·09-1·20] vs White ethnicity; p<0·0001), and individuals who were former smokers (1·89 [1·83-1·95] vs current smokers; p<0·0001). 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 488 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
ROC curves of the five best two-, three-, and four-parameter combinations were analyzed for significant superiority by a bootstrapping wrapper around a support vector machine with linear kernel. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 115 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These findings describe solanezumab effects on efficacy/safety measures in a mild AD population. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 659 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
155 (85%) patients completed the trial (78 [88%] in dimebon group, 77 [82%] in placebo group). 5 key findings →
Participants: 89 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognitive stimulation therapy for people with dementia has effectiveness advantages over, and may be more cost-effective than, treatment as usual. 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 91 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Light treatment alone did not improve nighttime sleep, daytime wake, or rest-activity rhythm. 4 key findings →
Participants: 16 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The incidence of MCR is high in older adults. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 3,128 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
70/100
These data suggest that resveratrol decreases CSF MMP9, modulates neuro-inflammation, and induces adaptive immunity. 3 key findings →
Participants: 119 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Current evidence shows that plasma p-tau217 is a sensitive maker of the clinical manifestation and progression of Alzheimer's disease and of pathological changes associated with this condition, including amyloid accumulation, tau burden, brain atrophy and physical degradation. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
There is a need for blood biomarkers to detect individuals at different Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages because obtaining cerebrospinal fluid-based biomarkers is invasive and costly. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among the individual plasma p-tau variants, p-tau217 consistently outperformed p-tau181 and p-tau231. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 352 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognition ranged from high to early cognitive decline (median Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score = 26). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 60 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 143 iRBD participants (110 male, 67.7 ± 8.0 years) were included. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,004 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
70/100
Nine proteins (amyloid-beta 42 (Aβ42), beta-secretase 1 (BACE1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), pTau181, pTau231, pTau217, t0tal tau (MAPT), neurofilament light (NfL) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE)) robustly differed between carriers and non-carriers cross-sectionally. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 113 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We included 401 individuals (61±9 years, 42% female, MMSE 28 ± 2, vascular comorbidities 8%-19%). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 401 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma amyloid-β peptide concentration has recently been shown to have high accuracy to predict amyloid-β plaque burden in the brain. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 15 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
IICV was associated with concurrent/baseline performance on several outcomes but did not modify associations between age and cognitive decline. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 235 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Seventy-six articles met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Bisecting N-acetylglucosamine correlated with tau levels (p < 0.0001). 4 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 233 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
70/100
A 95% (347/366) concordance rate was noted between clinicians' patient selection and the test's intended use criteria. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 366 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Gait speed for participants who worsened in CDR score during follow-up was slower at most examinations. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 287 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Lower CSF Aβ42, and higher t-tau/Aβ42 and p-tau/Aβ42 ratios were associated with BDI-II and BAI total scores, clinical depression (BDI-II ≥ 13), and clinical anxiety (BAI ≥ 10), as well as NPI-Q-assessed anxiety, apathy, and nighttime behavior. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 784 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →