Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Abstract Background Hippocampal volume atrophy is one of the most acknowledged supportive biomarkers for Alzheimer´s disease (AD). However, how hippocampal volumes along the anterior‐posterior axis mediate memory in aging and dementia is still subject of ongoing research. This study aimed to investigate the difference in volume of the hippocampus and its anterior and posterior subregions in a healthy young and senior control group as well as in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD and its ability to predict performance in spatial memory tasks. Method Thirteen healthy young controls (24.9 ± 2.8 years), fourteen healthy senior controls (66.6 ± 8.2 years) as well as fifteen MCI patients (71.1 ± 6.0 years) with biomarkers typical for AD were included in this study. Subject‐specific manual tracing of hippocampi according to the EADC‐ADNI Harmonized Protocol for Hippocampal Segmentation (HarP) was performed on high‐resolution T1‐weighted MRI. Following the segmentation into anterior and posterior hippocampal parts, volumetry of anterior, posterior and total hippocampus was computed. Every subject performed a combined spatial memory and object recognition paradigm. Brain‐behavior correlations were conducted in order to explore prediction of spatial memory performance. Result Volume measures of the hippocampi significantly differentiated healthy from pathological aging. Larger volume of posterior hippocampus in MCI patients correlated with higher performance scores in the spatial memory task (mean percentage of successfully retrieved object locations) whereas total and anterior hippocampal volume did not predict performance in the spatial memory task. Conclusion These results support a functional hippocampal anterior‐posterior differentiation in memory processes and further stress the importance of integrating the dissociation of the hippocampus along its long‐axis concerning functional connectivity in memory processes and dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kara, E., Toelke, S., & Onur, O. A. (2023). Volume of the posterior and not anterior hippocampus predicts spatial memory performance in Alzheimer´s Disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.076698

Vancouver

Kara E, Toelke S, Onur OA. Volume of the posterior and not anterior hippocampus predicts spatial memory performance in Alzheimer´s Disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2023. doi:10.1002/alz.076698.

BibTeX

@article{kara2023-5f0a5bfa,
  author  = {Kara, Esra and Toelke, Sophia and Onur, Oezguer A.},
  title   = {{Volume of the posterior and not anterior hippocampus predicts spatial memory performance in Alzheimer´s Disease}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& Dementia},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.076698},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.076698}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In a small sample of 13 healthy young controls, 14 healthy senior controls and 15 patients with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's, the volume of the posterior hippocampus predicted spatial memory performance, while the anterior hippocampus did not. This supports the idea that different parts of the hippocampus have different roles in memory, which may be relevant to understanding memory loss in Alzheimer's, but it is a small early study and does not test any treatment.

Study details

How this study scored 30/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 30 of 100.30 of 100 points earned70 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Oezguer A. Onur: h-index 33 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Cologne: institution h-index 879 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 30 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “disorder”

492 studies in the library carry the topic tag “disorder”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 492 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →