Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

A food desert is a geographic area lacking spatial and socioeconomic access to healthy foods. Disparities in food access and availability hinder public health and individual wellbeing. Access to healthy food has been evaluated by many agencies and researches yet they do not comparably demarcate food deserts or identify vulnerable populations in methodical terms. Existing literature suggests a link between food deserts, income level, and vehicle ownership. This study evaluates the existing methods and proposes a novel data-driven method to identify food deserts in Baltimore, Maryland. This study evaluates responses from 573 respondents for an in-depth analysis of individual grocery store choice and travel decisions. Chi-square automatic interaction detector (CHAID) decision trees are used to develop a user-generated food desert metric. Income level is found to be a key indicator for food desert demarcation, more than vehicle ownership. Network distance was applied to develop the prioritization matrix for a food desert. This research provides a replicable method for determining food-insecure areas in a locality by aggregating individual data to identify such areas. Such a metric can aid policymakers to make investment decisions and to direct resources to areas of need.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study develops a data-driven food desert metric for Baltimore, not Alzheimer's disease, so it offers nothing on treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's. It found income level was a key indicator for food desert demarcation.

Study details

How this study scored 30/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 29 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 30 of 100. Total 30 of 100.29 of the 96 points we could judge = 30 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, so that was left out: it earned 29 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 30 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 6 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 6 year(s) since 2022
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Istiak Bhuyan: h-index 5 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Morgan State University: institution h-index 204 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 29 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 29 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 30 out of 100.
Total 30 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Chavis, C., & Bhuyan, I. A. (2022). Data-Driven Food Desert Metric to Understand Access to Grocery Stores Using Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector Decision Tree Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221089308

Vancouver

Chavis C, Bhuyan IA. Data-Driven Food Desert Metric to Understand Access to Grocery Stores Using Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector Decision Tree Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2022. doi:10.1177/03611981221089308.

BibTeX

@article{chavis2022-8ca0501d,
  author  = {Chavis, Celeste and Bhuyan, Istiak A},
  title   = {{Data-Driven Food Desert Metric to Understand Access to Grocery Stores Using Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector Decision Tree Analysis}},
  journal = {Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.1177/03611981221089308},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221089308}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Also in Risk factors

356 studies in the library are filed under Risk factors with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Risk factors hub.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →