Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 35 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Age was similar between groups (p = 0.07). MCI had slower accelerations per minute and gyroscope degrees per minute at the head (p <0.001, d=0.51; p <0.001, d=0.69) and lumbar spine (p = 0.003, d=0.0.60; p <0.001, d=0.66) compared to CU. Regression models using the Flanker test explained the greatest amount of variance, explaining 26% and 37% at the head (p's <0.001) and 21% and 22% and at the lumbar spine (p <0.001) of acceleration and degrees of movement, respectively. Objective measurements of movement using wearable technology during real-world activities, such as grocery shopping, may be a digital biomarker of cognitive and physical function. As cognition declines, in particular executive functioning, the overall accelerations and speed of rotational movements particularly at the head may reflect more significant changes in cognition. Future studies are needed in community grocery stores to assess free-living IADLs to determine if such activities can be used as a digital biomarker of cognitive, motoric, and functional decline.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Cole, K. R., Gifford, K. A., & Davidson, L. (2025). Relationship of cognition and structured grocery shopping in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_107505

Vancouver

Cole KR, Gifford KA, Davidson L. Relationship of cognition and structured grocery shopping in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz70856_107505. PMID: 41511892.

BibTeX

@article{cole2025-41511892,
  author  = {Cole, Keith R. and Gifford, Katherine A. and Davidson, Leslie},
  title   = {{Relationship of cognition and structured grocery shopping in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz70856_107505},
  pmid    = {41511892},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_107505}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that older adults with mild cognitive impairment moved more slowly during a grocery shopping task than those without it, and that executive function explained much of this difference. It suggests wearable movement measures during real-world activities might serve as a marker, but it does not test a treatment or cure for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 35/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 35 of 100.35 of 100 points earned65 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 15 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Leslie Davidson: h-index 8 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Boston University: institution h-index 1,456 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41511892)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 35 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “controlled”

1,116 studies in the library carry the topic tag “controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,116 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →