Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100. Mild cognitive impairment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

BackgroundWhile transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) shows therapeutic promise for neurological and psychiatric disorders when applied repeatedly, its potential is constrained by multiple laboratory visits.ObjectiveTraining caregivers to administer tACS at home could make therapy more practical, especially for vulnerable populations such as individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This study aimed to evaluate caregivers' perceptions and experiences of administering home-based tACS to MCI patients under remote clinical supervision.MethodsTwenty family caregivers (M age: 70 ± 12 years, 11 female) were trained to operate a six-electrode tACS device and administered 20 home-based sessions to MCI patients under real-time remote supervision. Quantitative ratings assessed caregivers' confidence, burden, and perceived benefits.ResultsCaregivers demonstrated high confidence in technical procedures (85-100% across tasks) and rated training as very satisfactory. The majority (85%) would feel comfortable administering tACS independently without remote support. Although most caregivers (70%) experienced daily life interference, nearly all (90%) would reuse the system. Clinically, 45% of caregivers observed patient benefits, and 57% of MCI patients believed sessions were beneficial. Effects on quality of life and memory were mixed, with some reporting mild deterioration, possibly reflecting natural disease progression or the double-blind design.ConclusionsCaregiver-administered home-based tACS proved feasible and acceptable among older caregivers (average age 70), despite daily life interference and mixed clinical perceptions. These findings support the expansion of caregiver-delivered protocols while emphasizing the importance of enhanced training and ongoing remote support to reduce the burden and optimize outcomes.Clinical trial registryhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05708001.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Bouhour, C., Konstantopoulou, S. V., Piton, T., Tingaud, M., Mauriello, C., Lory, K. S., et al. (2026). Family caregiver perspectives on administering home-based stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261429857

Vancouver

Bouhour C, Konstantopoulou SV, Piton T, Tingaud M, Mauriello C, Lory KS, et al. Family caregiver perspectives on administering home-based stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 2026. doi:10.1177/13872877261429857. PMID: 41834385.

BibTeX

@article{bouhour2026-41834385,
  author  = {Bouhour, Camille and Konstantopoulou, Stefania V. and Piton, Timothy and Tingaud, Maxim and Mauriello, Cheyenne and Lory, K. S. and Unschuld, Paul Gerson and Bréchet, Lucie},
  title   = {{Family caregiver perspectives on administering home-based stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer s Disease},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1177/13872877261429857},
  pmid    = {41834385},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261429857}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Twenty family caregivers were trained to give home-based transcranial alternating current stimulation to patients with mild cognitive impairment under remote supervision, and most were confident and willing to reuse the system, though most experienced daily life interference. Effects on quality of life and memory were mixed, with some reporting mild deterioration, so this is an early feasibility study of caregiver-delivered stimulation, not proof of benefit.

Study details

How this study scored 33/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 33 of 100.33 of 100 points earned67 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer s Disease)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 218 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Lucie Bréchet: h-index 19 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Geneva: institution h-index 1,049 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41834385)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 33 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment

Also tagged “examination”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “examination”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Mild cognitive impairment

See all studies in Mild cognitive impairment →