Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 54 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Introduction This analysis of the phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial examined whether plasma tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 217 (p-tau217) level can reliably monitor treatment-related amyloid clearance (TRAC) after donanemab treatment in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and plasma p-tau217 levels were assessed at baseline and longitudinally during study treatment. The diagnostic performance of p-tau217 in detecting post-treatment TRAC ( Results Plasma p-tau217 showed suboptimal performance in detecting TRAC by PET in donanemab-treated participants (N = 830), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.61 at 52 weeks. Discussion Despite reductions in plasma p-tau217 with donanemab treatment, this biomarker cannot currently be used to accurately detect TRAC by PET (< 24.1 CL) in individuals with early symptomatic AD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Collins, E. C., Lu, M., Beck, R., Hendrix, J., Hodsdon, M. E., & Hansson, O. (2026). Plasma P-tau217 for detecting amyloid clearance after donanemab in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71740

Vancouver

Collins EC, Lu M, Beck R, Hendrix J, Hodsdon ME, Hansson O. Plasma P-tau217 for detecting amyloid clearance after donanemab in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2026. doi:10.1002/alz.71740. PMID: 42565262.

BibTeX

@article{collins2026-42565262,
  author  = {Collins, E. C. and Lu, M. and Beck, R. and Hendrix, J. and Hodsdon, M. E. and Hansson, O.},
  title   = {{Plasma P-tau217 for detecting amyloid clearance after donanemab in Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& Dementia},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.71740},
  pmid    = {42565262},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71740}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This analysis of the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial found that plasma p-tau217 performed suboptimally in detecting amyloid clearance by PET after donanemab treatment, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.61 at 52 weeks. The authors conclude that this biomarker cannot currently be used to accurately detect treatment-related amyloid clearance in people with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

Limitations

Single assay and single trial population; industry-authored; other blood markers or ratios were not evaluated here.

How this study scored 54/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 51 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 54 of 100. Total 54 of 100.51 of the 94 points we could judge = 54 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a large phase 3 trial. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 51 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 54 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A large phase 3 trial
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “null-result” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 830 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Oskar Hansson holds only 4 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Eli Lilly (United States): institution h-index 744 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42565262)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 51 / 94 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 51 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 54 out of 100.
Total 54 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 16.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “phosphorylated”

733 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylated”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 733 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →