Home › Research › Biomarkers
PrecivityAD2™ Blood Test: Analytical Validation of an LC-MS/MS Assay for Quantifying Plasma Phospho-tau217 and Non-Phospho-tau217 Peptide Concentrations That Are Used with Plasma Amyloid-β42/40 in a Multianalyte Assay with Algorithmic Analysis for Detecting Brain Amyloid Pathology
Eastwood SM, Meyer MR, Kirmess KM, Wente-Roth TL, Irvin F, Holubasch MS, Verghese PB, West T et al.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-08-10
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive irreversible neurodegenerative disorder that represents a major global public health concern. Traditionally, AD is diagnosed using cerebrospinal fluid biomarker analysis or brain imaging modalities. Recently, less burdensome, more widely available blood biomarker (BBM) assays for amyloid-beta (Aβ42/40) and phosphorylated-tau concentrations have been found to accurately identify the presence/absence of brain amyloid plaques and tau tangles and have helped to streamline AD diagnosis. However, few BBMs have been rigorously analytically validated. Herein, we report the analytical validation of a novel liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) multiplex method for quantifying plasma phosphorylated-tau217 (p-tau217) and non-phosphorylated-tau217 (np-tau217) peptide concentrations. We combined the p-tau217/np-tau217 concentrations ratio (%p-tau217) and the previously validated LC-MS/MS multiplex assay for plasma Aβ42/40 into a new multianalyte assay with algorithmic analysis (MAAA; PrecivityAD2™ test) that identifies brain amyloid status based on brain amyloid positron emission tomography. We found (a) the %p-tau217 assay is precise, accurate, sensitive, and linear over a wide analytical measurement range, and free from carryover and interference; (b) the pre-analytical specimen collection, processing, storage, and shipping conditions that maintain plasma tau peptide stability; and (c) using the measured analytical imprecision for plasma Aβ42/40 and p-tau217/np-tau217 levels in a worst-case scenario model, the PrecivityAD2 test algorithm for amyloid pathology classification changed for only 3.5% of participants from brain amyloid positive to negative, or from negative to positive. The plasma sample preparation and LC-MS/MS methods underlying the PrecivityAD2 test are suitable for use in the clinical laboratory and valid for the test's intended purpose: to aid in the diagnostic evaluation of individuals aged 55 and older with signs or symptoms of mild cognitive impairment or dementia.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Eastwood, S. M., Meyer, M. R., Kirmess, K. M., Wente-Roth, T. L., Irvin, F., Holubasch, M. S., et al. (2024). PrecivityAD2™ Blood Test: Analytical Validation of an LC-MS/MS Assay for Quantifying Plasma Phospho-tau217 and Non-Phospho-tau217 Peptide Concentrations That Are Used with Plasma Amyloid-β42/40 in a Multianalyte Assay with Algorithmic Analysis for Detecting Brain Amyloid Pathology. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161739
Vancouver
Eastwood SM, Meyer MR, Kirmess KM, Wente-Roth TL, Irvin F, Holubasch MS, et al. PrecivityAD2™ Blood Test: Analytical Validation of an LC-MS/MS Assay for Quantifying Plasma Phospho-tau217 and Non-Phospho-tau217 Peptide Concentrations That Are Used with Plasma Amyloid-β42/40 in a Multianalyte Assay with Algorithmic Analysis for Detecting Brain Amyloid Pathology. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2024. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14161739. PMID: 39202226.
BibTeX
@article{eastwood2024-39202226,
author = {Eastwood, S. M. and Meyer, M. R. and Kirmess, K. M. and Wente-Roth, T. L. and Irvin, F. and Holubasch, M. S. and Verghese, P. B. and West, T. and others},
title = {{PrecivityAD2™ Blood Test: Analytical Validation of an LC-MS/MS Assay for Quantifying Plasma Phospho-tau217 and Non-Phospho-tau217 Peptide Concentrations That Are Used with Plasma Amyloid-β42/40 in a Multianalyte Assay with Algorithmic Analysis for Detecting Brain Amyloid Pathology}},
journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.3390/diagnostics14161739},
pmid = {39202226},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161739}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- We found (a) the %p-tau217 assay is precise, accurate, sensitive, and linear over a wide analytical measurement range, and free from carryover and interference; (b) the pre-analytical specimen collection, processing, storage, and shipping conditions that maintain plasma tau peptide stability; and (c) using the measured analytical imprecision for plasma Aβ42/40 and p-tau217/np-tau217 levels in a worst-case scenario model, the PrecivityAD2 test algorithm for amyloid pathology classification changed for only 3.5% of participants from brain amyloid positive to negative, or from negative to positive.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Effect size3.5%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 48/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 28 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 48 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39202226) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 28 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 28 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 48 out of 100. |
| Total | 48 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also tagged “assay”
4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assay”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.