Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Over a median follow-up of 13 years, 5,304 participants developed dementia. Six risk factor classes were identified. Compared to participants with zero or one risk factor, all classes were associated with dementia risk: 'multiple risk factors' (hazard ratio [HR] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.11-2.68), 'hearing loss and unhealthy lifestyle' (HR=1.37, 95% CI 1.22-1.55), 'sleep and psychosocial factors' (HR=1.34, 95% CI 1.20-1.49), 'poor cardiometabolic health' (HR=1.32, 95% CI 1.19-1.46), 'heavy drinking and unhealthy lifestyle' (HR=1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.35), and 'vitamin D deficiency, sedentary and psychosocial factors' (HR=1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.35). We identified risk factor patterns that were differentially associated with dementia risk. These findings suggest that accounting for the co-occurrence of risk factors might be an effective approach for risk stratification and developing effective dementia prevention strategies.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Uejima, Y., Calvin, C. M., Kuzma, E., & Littlejohns, T. J. (2026). Patterns of modifiable lifestyle, behavioural and health-related risk factors and their associations with incident dementia in UK Biobank. medRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.24.26363838

Vancouver

Uejima Y, Calvin CM, Kuzma E, Littlejohns TJ. Patterns of modifiable lifestyle, behavioural and health-related risk factors and their associations with incident dementia in UK Biobank. medRxiv (preprint). 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.09.24.26363838.

BibTeX

@article{uejima2026-bf9e6ff5,
  author  = {Uejima, Y. and Calvin, C. M. and Kuzma, E. and Littlejohns, T. J.},
  title   = {{Patterns of modifiable lifestyle, behavioural and health-related risk factors and their associations with incident dementia in UK Biobank}},
  journal = {medRxiv (preprint)},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.09.24.26363838},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.24.26363838}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In UK Biobank data, certain patterns of lifestyle and health risk factors were linked to higher dementia risk, with the highest risk in people who had multiple risk factors at once. This suggests that addressing combinations of risk factors may help with prevention strategies, but it is an observational study and does not prove that changing these factors prevents dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 30 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 32 of 100. Raw total 32 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 32 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 32 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 30 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 32 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv (preprint))
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 151,832 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Thomas J. Littlejohns: h-index 33 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Oxford: institution h-index 2,205 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 30 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 30 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 32 out of 100.
Total 32 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also tagged “incidence”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “incidence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →