Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Reviewed as evidence on: Daily step count / midlife physical activity and cognitive decline and tau accumulation in amyloid+ 3 studies (what the news said). Being listed means the study bears on the question, not that it agrees with the news.

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Previous cohort studies have investigated the relationship between self-reported physical activity (PA) and dementia. Evidence from objective device-measured PA data is lacking. This study aimed to explore the association of device-measured PA with the risk of dementia incidence and common subtypes (Alzheimer's disease [AD] and vascular dementia) using the UK Biobank study. Methods 84,854 participants (55.8% women), invited to participate in the device-measured PA between 2013 and 2015, were included in this prospective cohort study. Wrist accelerometers were used to measure light, moderate, vigorous, moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and total PA intensity and duration (MET/min/week). Incident dementia (fatal and non-fatal) was extracted from hospital episodes records for incidence and death register for mortality. Incidence follow-up was carried out until the end of March 2021in England and Scotland and the end of March 2018 in Wales. Mortality data were available until February 2021. Nonlinear associations were first investigated using penalised cubic splines fitted in the Cox proportional hazard models. In addition, using MVPA, five categories were created. Associations of these categories with the outcomes were investigated using Cox proportional hazard models. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle and health-related factors. Results After a median follow-up of 6.3 years, 678 individuals were diagnosed with dementia. Evidence of nonlinearity was observed for all PA modes and all-cause dementia. For categories of MVPA, there was a significant trend towards a low risk of overall dementia when higher levels of MVPA were achieved (HR trend 0.66 [95% CI 0.62 to 0.70]. The lowest risk was identified in individuals who performed more than 1200 MET/min/week, those who had 84% (95% CI 0.12 to 0.21) lower risk of incident dementia compared to those who performed Conclusions Participants with higher PA levels had a lower risk of incident dementia than those less active, independently of sociodemographic, lifestyle factors and comorbidity. Considering that the majority of previous studies have reported this association using self-reported data, our findings highlight the strong inverse association between PA objectively measured and incident dementia.

Key findings

Why it matters

This UK Biobank cohort using device-measured activity found that higher activity levels were linked to lower dementia risk. Being observational, it shows an association and cannot prove that activity prevents dementia.

Study details

Limitations

Short follow-up leaves room for reverse causation; single week of accelerometry; the very large effect may partly reflect prodromal inactivity.

How this study scored 66/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 65 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 66 of 100. Total 66 of 100.65 of the 98 points we could judge = 66 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 65 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 66 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC Medicine)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 BMC Medicine: journal h-index 259 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 84,854 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 58 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 8.3 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 35 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Carlos A. Celis-Morales: h-index 71 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Glasgow: institution h-index 1,600 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34852818)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 65 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 65 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 66 out of 100.
Total 66 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Petermann-Rocha, F., Lyall, D. M., Gray, SR., Gill, J. M. R., Sattar, N., Welsh, P., et al. (2021). Dose-response association between device-measured physical activity and incident dementia: a prospective study from UK Biobank. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02172-5

Vancouver

Petermann-Rocha F, Lyall DM, Gray SR, Gill JMR, Sattar N, Welsh P, et al. Dose-response association between device-measured physical activity and incident dementia: a prospective study from UK Biobank. BMC Medicine. 2021. doi:10.1186/s12916-021-02172-5. PMID: 34852818.

BibTeX

@article{petermannrocha2021-34852818,
  author  = {Petermann-Rocha, F. and Lyall, D. M. and Gray, SR. and Gill, J. M. R. and Sattar, N. and Welsh, P. and others},
  title   = {{Dose-response association between device-measured physical activity and incident dementia: a prospective study from UK Biobank}},
  journal = {BMC Medicine},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1186/s12916-021-02172-5},
  pmid    = {34852818},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02172-5}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also tagged “daily-steps-and-amyloid-positive-decline”

3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “daily-steps-and-amyloid-positive-decline”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →