Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Eighteen studies identified four core components of multidomain interventions: physical exercise, cognitive training, nutrition, and cardiovascular risk management. The more often reported implementation pattern was 3-5 weekly combined physical/cognitive sessions over 6-24 months. Regarding outcomes, cognitive function improvement, quality of life enhancement (+7.3 EQ-5D), and dementia risk reduction (40%) were reported in multiple studies, though inconsistent results existed. Subgroup analysis showed that Chinese studies had slightly lower cognitive improvement (MMSE +1.5-1.7) than Western studies (+1.8-2.1), but higher adherence (80% vs. 65% on average) due to family-participatory interventions. Key barriers included low adherence, resource limitations, and cultural disparities. Multidomain strategies are associated with addressing dementia risk factors, but existing evidence shows heterogeneity in intervention models and implementation barriers. Future research should focus on optimizing intervention models for Chinese populations, developing multidimensional assessments, and implementing culturally adaptive strategies to enhance scalability. Impact: These interventions are critical for dementia prevention in high-burden regions (e.g., China). Integrating evidence regarding differences between China and non-Chinese countries/regions into public health programs and tackling systemic barriers can enhance accessibility, equity, and feasibility, thus mitigating the societal impact of dementia amid global aging.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review of 18 studies found that multidomain interventions combining exercise, cognitive training, nutrition, and cardiovascular risk management were linked to cognitive improvement, better quality of life, and reduced dementia risk, though results were inconsistent. Key barriers included low adherence, resource limits, and cultural differences, so more research is needed to optimize these programs.

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 38 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 40 of 100. Total 40 of 100.38 of the 96 points we could judge = 40 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in Neurology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Frontiers in Neurology: journal h-index 162 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Yu Liu holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 China Medical University: institution h-index 382 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41641324)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 38 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100.
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Guo, X., Fan, C., Ren, J., Zhang, Z., Ni, C., & Liu, Y. (2026). Multidomain intervention for dementia prevention: a scoping review. Frontiers in Neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1729290

Vancouver

Guo X, Fan C, Ren J, Zhang Z, Ni C, Liu Y. Multidomain intervention for dementia prevention: a scoping review. Frontiers in Neurology. 2026. doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1729290. PMID: 41641324.

BibTeX

@article{guo2026-41641324,
  author  = {Guo, Xindi and Fan, C. and Ren, Jiabao and Zhang, Ziyi and Ni, Cuiping and Liu, Yu},
  title   = {{Multidomain intervention for dementia prevention: a scoping review}},
  journal = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1729290},
  pmid    = {41641324},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1729290}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 17.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →