Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 69 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objective To empirically validate the expanded concept of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which differentiates between four clinical subtypes-amnestic MCI-single domain, amnestic MCI-multiple domains, nonamnestic MCI-single domain, and nonamnestic MCI-multiple domains-and to examine the prevalence, course, and outcome of these four clinical MCI subtypes. Methods We studied a community sample of 980 dementia-free individuals aged 75 years or older who participated in the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA 75+). All participants were examined by neuropsychological testing based on 6 years of observation. The diagnoses of the four clinical MCI subtypes were made according to the original and to slightly modified criteria by Petersen et al. (2001) (both with a cutoff of 1.0 SD and with a cutoff of 1.5 SD). The complete range of outcome types (dementia, death, improvement, stable diagnosis, unstable diagnosis) was described for all subtypes. The relative predictive power of stable MCI for dementia onset was determined. Results MCI-single domain is more frequent than MCI-multiple domains, and the nonamnestic MCI type is as frequent as the amnestic MCI type. The "MCI modified, 1.0 SD" criteria have the highest relative predictive power for the development of dementia (sensitivity = 74%, specificity = 73%). Alzheimer disease (AD) was the most common type of dementia at follow-up in all but one MCI subtype. Participants with nonamnestic MCI-multiple domains were more likely to progress to a non-AD dementia. Conclusions It has been assumed that each MCI subtype is associated with an increased risk for a particular type of dementia. We can only partially agree with this.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Busse, A., Hensel, A., Gühne, U., Angermeyer, M. C., & Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2006). Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000249117.23318.e1

Vancouver

Busse A, Hensel A, Gühne U, Angermeyer MC, Riedel-Heller SG. Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes. Neurology. 2006. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000249117.23318.e1. PMID: 17190940.

BibTeX

@article{busse2006-17190940,
  author  = {Busse, A. and Hensel, A. and Gühne, U. and Angermeyer, M. C. and Riedel-Heller, S. G.},
  title   = {{Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2006},
  doi     = {10.1212/01.wnl.0000249117.23318.e1},
  pmid    = {17190940},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000249117.23318.e1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 980 dementia-free people aged 75 or older in Leipzig, followed for 6 years, mild cognitive impairment without memory problems was as common as the memory type, and Alzheimer's disease was the most common dementia to develop in all but one subtype. Of the definitions tested, a modified version of the Petersen criteria with a 1.0 SD cutoff predicted dementia best, but only moderately (sensitivity 74%, specificity 73%). The authors could "only partially agree" that each MCI subtype points to a particular type of dementia; people with non-memory problems in several areas were more likely to develop a non-Alzheimer dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 69/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 4 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 69 of 100.69 of 100 points earned31 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size and effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2006 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 555 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 25.2 citations a year over 22 year(s) since 2006
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 15.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 4 / 6 Cited by 35 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 48 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Steffi Gerlinde Riedel-Heller: h-index 100 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Leipzig University: institution h-index 763 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 17190940)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 69 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

35 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “mini-mental”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “mini-mental”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →