Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 53 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

This study investigated the benefits of resistance training on cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment. We searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, and seven randomized controlled trials were reviewed. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's bias assessment tool. Standard mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for statistical analysis. This meta-analysis assessed three variables: general cognitive function, executive function and working memory. The results indicate that general cognitive function improved significantly (standardized mean difference: 0.53, P=0.04), and further subgroup analyses on frequency and duration per session showed that the subgroups 'twice a week' (P=0.01) and 'duration per session > 60 min' (P=0.0006) exhibited better performance than the subgroups 'three time a week' (P=0.47) and 'duration per session <60 min' (P=0.53). Additionally, a moderate effect size was found in executive function (standardized mean difference: 0.50, P=0.0003), and there was non-significant effect in working memory (P=0.14). In summary, resistance training may mitigate mild cognitive impairment by improving cognition. Larger-scale studies are recommended to demonstrate the relationship between resistance training and cognition in mild cognitive impairment.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review of seven trials found that resistance training improved general cognitive function and executive function in people with mild cognitive impairment, but not working memory. The authors call for larger studies, so it does not yet show that this training prevents or treats Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

Limitations

Only seven small trials; heterogeneous protocols; effect sizes given without confidence intervals in the abstract; no dementia-incidence outcomes.

How this study scored 53/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 2 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 52 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 53 of 100. Total 53 of 100.52 of the 98 points we could judge = 53 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. Scored zero for sample size and studied in people because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 52 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 53 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International Journal of Sports Medicine)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 International Journal of Sports Medicine: journal h-index 179 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 2 / 5 Rated “early” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 35 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 4.4 citations a year over 8 year(s) since 2020
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 22 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Shuhong Wang: h-index 13 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Central South University: institution h-index 699 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32599643)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 52 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 52 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 53 out of 100.
Total 53 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Zhang, L., Li, B., Yang, J., Wang, F., Tang, Q., & Wang, S. (2020). Meta-analysis: Resistance Training Improves Cognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment. International Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1186-1272

Vancouver

Zhang L, Li B, Yang J, Wang F, Tang Q, Wang S. Meta-analysis: Resistance Training Improves Cognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020. doi:10.1055/a-1186-1272. PMID: 32599643.

BibTeX

@article{zhang2020-32599643,
  author  = {Zhang, L. and Li, B. and Yang, J. and Wang, F. and Tang, Q. and Wang, S.},
  title   = {{Meta-analysis: Resistance Training Improves Cognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment}},
  journal = {International Journal of Sports Medicine},
  year    = {2020},
  doi     = {10.1055/a-1186-1272},
  pmid    = {32599643},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1186-1272}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →