Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Inflammation and the immune system

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's disease, a common non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease, significantly impacts individuals' quality of life and predicts dementia risk, underscoring its clinical research importance. This study aimed to characterize the global bibliometric landscape and identify research hotspots, knowledge gaps, and future trends in the PD-MCI field over the past two decades using bibliometric and visualization methods. Methods Literature related to PD-MCI published between 2005 and 2024 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer were employed for visual analysis of annual publication volume, country/institutional distribution, author collaborations, journal co-citations, and keyword co-occurrence and bursts, constructing knowledge maps. Results Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease research demonstrated significant growth, with sustained increases in annual publication volume and citation frequency. The United States dominated the field, while research output from countries like China grew rapidly. Research hotspots evolved from early explorations of molecular mechanisms toward clinical and translational studies focusing on neuroimaging, biomarkers, application of MDS diagnostic criteria, non-motor symptoms, and cognitive subtypes. Recently, machine learning, multi-omics integration, neuroinflammation, and mitochondrial function have emerged as new frontiers. Conclusion Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease research has progressed from basic mechanism exploration to a multidisciplinary, integrated clinical-basic stage, following an evolutionary path of "pathological mechanism - clinical phenotype - biomarker - intervention strategy." Future research should focus on unifying diagnostic criteria, deepening understanding of multifactorial pathological mechanisms, developing precise biomarker combinations, and exploring individualized intervention strategies to achieve early warning and disease modification for PD-MCI.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Peng, Y., Chen, H., Peng, K., Li, L., & Ma, Z. (2025). Mapping the research landscape of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's disease: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1624420

Vancouver

Peng Y, Chen H, Peng K, Li L, Ma Z. Mapping the research landscape of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's disease: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2025. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1624420. PMID: 41001154.

BibTeX

@article{peng2025-41001154,
  author  = {Peng, Y. and Chen, H. and Peng, K. and Li, L. and Ma, Z.},
  title   = {{Mapping the research landscape of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's disease: a bibliometric and visualization analysis}},
  journal = {Frontiers in aging neuroscience},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3389/fnagi.2025.1624420},
  pmid    = {41001154},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1624420}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This analysis mapped two decades of published research on mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease, a problem that predicts later dementia. Output has grown steadily, led by the United States with China rising fast, and the focus has shifted from basic mechanisms toward brain imaging, biomarkers and diagnostic criteria, with machine learning and neuroinflammation as newer topics. It describes research trends rather than treatment results, and calls for unified diagnostic criteria and better biomarker combinations.

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 40 of the 93 points it could be judged on, which is 43 of 100. Total 43 of 100.40 of the 93 points we could judge = 43 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 40 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in aging neuroscience)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience: journal h-index 174 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41001154)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 40 / 93 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 40 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100.
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Inflammation and the immune system

Also tagged “mini-mental”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “mini-mental”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Inflammation and the immune system

See all studies in Inflammation and the immune system →