Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 35 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract Dementia is a debilitating disease that leads to a gradual loss of memory and other cognitive abilities and tends to develop in people over 60 years of age. The number of people worldwide with dementia is expected to increase from 57.4 million in 2019 to 131.5 million in 2050. Diagnosis of dementia is a critical task, and some biomarkers and psychological and demographic measures have been used to diagnose dementia clinically. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities to improve diagnostic accuracy. In this study, we propose an approach based on machine learning and graph analysis to identify important patterns and diagnostic markers for dementia. The novel contributions of this study include a descriptive probability density function (PDF) analysis to examine the distribution of clinically relevant markers across diagnostic groups, providing exploratory insights into group-wise feature behavior. A comprehensive evaluation of ten machine learning (ML) models is conducted under strict subject-level data separation to identify robust classification performance. In addition, feature ranking is assessed using three complementary strategies (Random Forest importance, Chi-Square statistics, and Boruta ranking) to evaluate the consistency and robustness of marker relevance. Out of ten ML models evaluated, the Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy of 94.37%, with a macro F1-score of 86.96%. The result of the ML model is further validated using a graphical analysis of critical markers. The results of this study might help to improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study used machine learning and graph analysis to identify patterns and markers for classifying dementia subtypes, with Random Forest performing best among ten models. The authors state the results might help improve diagnostic accuracy, but no treatment or prevention effect is reported.

Study details

How this study scored 35/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 35 of 100.35 of 100 points earned65 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Discover Computing)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Discover Computing: journal h-index 21 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 7.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Sami Azam: h-index 44 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Charles Darwin University: institution h-index 293 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 35 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Sutradhar, D., Rahman, M. A., Fahad, N. M., Sakib, S., Islam, A. B. M. A. A., Jonkman, M., et al. (2026). Investigating dementia patterns by machine learning and graph-based marker analysis for multiclass dementia diagnosis. Discover Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-026-10153-6

Vancouver

Sutradhar D, Rahman MA, Fahad NM, Sakib S, Islam ABMAA, Jonkman M, et al. Investigating dementia patterns by machine learning and graph-based marker analysis for multiclass dementia diagnosis. Discover Computing. 2026. doi:10.1007/s10791-026-10153-6.

BibTeX

@article{sutradhar2026-ab39e9ad,
  author  = {Sutradhar, Debopom and Rahman, Md. Abdur and Fahad, Nur Mohammad and Sakib, Sadman and Islam, A. B. M. Alim Al and Jonkman, Mirjam and Azam, Sami},
  title   = {{Investigating dementia patterns by machine learning and graph-based marker analysis for multiclass dementia diagnosis}},
  journal = {Discover Computing},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1007/s10791-026-10153-6},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-026-10153-6}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →