Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The tests qualitatively and statistically associated to a cognitive decline are MMSE, FAB, BSTR, AM, and VSF, of which at least three were considered the most informative also by machine learning. 73% average accuracy was obtained in the diagnosis prediction on three subsets of original and external data. Detecting the most informative tests could reduce the visits' time and prevent the cognitive assessment from being biased by external factors. Machine learning models' prediction represents a useful baseline for the clinician's actual diagnosis and a reliable insight into the future development of the patient's cognitive status.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that certain neuropsychological tests were associated with cognitive decline and that machine learning models predicted diagnosis with 73% average accuracy. It is about identifying informative tests and predicting progression, not about treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 40 of 100.40 of 100 points earned60 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Aging Clinical and Experimental Research)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Aging Clinical and Experimental Research: journal h-index 125 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 281 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Giuseppe Jurman: h-index 40 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Humanitas University: institution h-index 323 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40072711)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Cazzolli, C., Chierici, M., Dallabona, M., Guella, C., & Jurman, G. (2025). Neuropsychological tests and machine learning: identifying predictors of MCI and dementia progression. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-02962-4

Vancouver

Cazzolli C, Chierici M, Dallabona M, Guella C, Jurman G. Neuropsychological tests and machine learning: identifying predictors of MCI and dementia progression. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2025. doi:10.1007/s40520-025-02962-4. PMID: 40072711.

BibTeX

@article{cazzolli2025-40072711,
  author  = {Cazzolli, Carlotta and Chierici, Marco and Dallabona, Monica and Guella, Chiara and Jurman, Giuseppe},
  title   = {{Neuropsychological tests and machine learning: identifying predictors of MCI and dementia progression}},
  journal = {Aging Clinical and Experimental Research},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s40520-025-02962-4},
  pmid    = {40072711},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-02962-4}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →