Home › Research › Getting a diagnosis
Explainable Machine Learning-Based Classification of Clinical Dementia Ratings Using a Tablet-Based Cognitive Assessment
Avichandra Singh Ningthoujam, Yo-Ping Huang, Gomathi Thiyagarajan, Shilpa Sharma. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2025-11-17
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Dementia is a substantial public health issue with increasing prevalence globally. Fast and accurate diagnosis is vital for successful management and intervention. This article presents a new machine-learning model that uses data from a tablet computer cognitive test to label clinical dementia ratings (CDR). Traditional cognitive assessments often depend on subjective evaluations, which may introduce bias and limit applicability across diverse populations. We evaluated five different machine-learning algorithms for dementia classification, integrating advanced feature extraction techniques, and to enhance the interpretability of our model, we employed explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques, specifically local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) with ensemble methods to capture subtle cognitive deficits and these methods elucidate the contributions of individual features to the model’s predictions, fostering trust and transparency in clinical applications. Area Under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic (AUROC) is used to measure the model’s ability to distinguish between classes across various threshold settings. Among different ML models, the deep learning model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 100% and 95.8% for training and testing, respectively. Additionally, it attained area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) scores of 1.00 (95% CI 1.00–1.00) for training and 0.98 (95% CI 0.92–1.00) for testing, indicating strong discrimination between different CDR levels. Our analysis identified features, such as delay, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score, gender, yong_overtimes, and mouse_times as the top five predictors. On the other hand, angle degree, spiral tremble, and yong tremble were the least predictive features. These findings are consistent with the previous literature, highlighting the importance of these features in the assessment of dementia. Our approach illustrates the promise of fusing state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms with explainability methods to enhance the accuracy and interpretability of dementia classification. Such integration is central to the development of trustworthy digital tools that can support early diagnosis and management of dementia, eventually leading to improved patient outcomes.
Key findings
- Among different ML models, the deep learning model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 100% and 95.8% for training and testing, respectively.
- These findings are consistent with the previous literature, highlighting the importance of these features in the assessment of dementia.
Why it matters
This study developed a machine-learning model using tablet-based cognitive test data to classify clinical dementia ratings, with a deep learning model achieving high accuracy. It concerns automated classification for diagnosis and does not test any treatment, cure or prevention.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Getting a diagnosis →
Study details
- Effect size95.8%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 35/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems: journal h-index 72 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 1 / 5 | 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 2 / 6 | Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Shilpa Sharma: h-index 8 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | National Taipei University of Technology: institution h-index 224 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 2 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 35 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1007/s44196-025-01019-8
- Original source →
- Free full text: International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Ningthoujam, A. S., Huang, Y.-P., Thiyagarajan, G., & Sharma, S. (2025). Explainable Machine Learning-Based Classification of Clinical Dementia Ratings Using a Tablet-Based Cognitive Assessment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-025-01019-8
Vancouver
Ningthoujam AS, Huang Y.-P, Thiyagarajan G, Sharma S. Explainable Machine Learning-Based Classification of Clinical Dementia Ratings Using a Tablet-Based Cognitive Assessment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems. 2025. doi:10.1007/s44196-025-01019-8.
BibTeX
@article{ningthoujam2025-661d0e63,
author = {Ningthoujam, Avichandra Singh and Huang, Yo-Ping and Thiyagarajan, Gomathi and Sharma, Shilpa},
title = {{Explainable Machine Learning-Based Classification of Clinical Dementia Ratings Using a Tablet-Based Cognitive Assessment}},
journal = {International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1007/s44196-025-01019-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-025-01019-8}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.