Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

BackgroundElectroencephalogram (EEG) is a promising, non-invasive method for identifying the presence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by recognizing specific brain activity patterns associated with the disease. However, research on the correlation between EEG and the degree of cognitive impairment is still lacking.ObjectiveIn this study, we employ machine learning models to explore the potential of EEG in distinguishing different levels of cognitive impairment and various types of dementia.MethodsA total of 431 participants, including 77 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 167 patients with mild dementia, 110 patients with moderate dementia, and 77 patients with severe dementia were enrolled. Among them, 91 patients have detailed biomarker results to support differential diagnosis, with 77 AD and 14 frontotemporal dementia. After feature extraction, the rule-based representation learning was used to train models for EEG-based classification tasks.ResultsOur model can effectively differentiate between CU and moderate-to-severe dementia (AUC 0.8475), as well as between CU and AD patients in individuals under 65 (AUC 0.8170). However, our preliminary analysis was not able to effectively distinguish between different types of dementia. It is also challenging to differentiate between CU and mild dementia groups, as well as between the moderate and severe dementia.ConclusionsOur study suggests that EEG might be used not only in the early identification of AD, but also in the diagnosis and monitoring of the entire dementia spectrum, encompassing various stages and types of cognitive decline.

Key findings

Why it matters

An EEG-based machine learning model could tell apart cognitively unimpaired people from those with moderate-to-severe dementia, and from Alzheimer's patients under 65, but it could not reliably distinguish different dementia types or separate unimpaired people from mild dementia. This is a diagnostic study only and says nothing about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 43 of 100.43 of 100 points earned57 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer s Disease)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 218 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 431 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Jing Gao: h-index 22 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Tsinghua University: institution h-index 1,218 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40719017)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Huang, Y., Li, Z., Liu, F., Li, B., Mao, C., Dong, L., et al. (2025). Application of machine learning in EEG-based dementia diagnosis: Classification and differential diagnosis. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251360331

Vancouver

Huang Y, Li Z, Liu F, Li B, Mao C, Dong L, et al. Application of machine learning in EEG-based dementia diagnosis: Classification and differential diagnosis. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 2025. doi:10.1177/13872877251360331. PMID: 40719017.

BibTeX

@article{huang2025-40719017,
  author  = {Huang, Yixuan and Li, Zhenyu and Liu, Fangzhou and Li, Bo and Mao, Chenhui and Dong, Liling and Chu, Shanshan and Jin, Wei and others},
  title   = {{Application of machine learning in EEG-based dementia diagnosis: Classification and differential diagnosis}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer s Disease},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1177/13872877251360331},
  pmid    = {40719017},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251360331}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 18.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →