Home › Research › Getting a diagnosis
Multi-model deep learning for dementia detection: addressing data and model limitations
Areej Y. Bayahya, Fares Jammal, Haneen Reda Banjar, Fathy Elbouraey Eassa, Omar Talabay, Sultan Hassan Alamri. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2025-11-25
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Among all evaluated models, the 3D-CNN and multimodal attention models achieved the highest performance, with accuracies of 84% and 86%, specificities of 83% and 86%, and sensitivities of 84% and 86%, respectively. The ViT and CapsNet models achieved 100% sensitivity for Alzheimer's disease (AD) but demonstrated low precision for AD (43%) and 0% for other classes, indicating class imbalance effects. All models showed reduced performance and bias toward certain classes. The findings highlight the limitations of current architectures in sMRI dementia classification, including suboptimal feature extraction and class-specific biases. While certain models, such as multimodal attention and 3D-CNN, performed better overall, precision and generalization remain challenges. Future work should focus on improved data representation through advanced computer vision methods and architectural modifications to enhance diagnostic accuracy and computational efficiency.
Key findings
- Among all evaluated models, the 3D-CNN and multimodal attention models achieved the highest performance, with accuracies of 84% and 86%, specificities of 83% and 86%, and sensitivities of 84% and 86%, respectively.
- The ViT and CapsNet models achieved 100% sensitivity for Alzheimer's disease (AD) but demonstrated low precision for AD (43%) and 0% for other classes, indicating class imbalance effects.
- All models showed reduced performance and bias toward certain classes.
- The findings highlight the limitations of current architectures in sMRI dementia classification, including suboptimal feature extraction and class-specific biases.
- While certain models, such as multimodal attention and 3D-CNN, performed better overall, precision and generalization remain challenges.
Why it matters
This study tested several deep learning models for classifying dementia from structural MRI scans, and the best models reached about 84-86% accuracy. However, all models showed reduced performance and bias toward certain classes, so these tools are not yet reliable enough for diagnosis and need better data representation and architecture.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Getting a diagnosis →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 35/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in Neuroscience) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | Frontiers in Neuroscience: journal h-index 226 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 1 / 5 | 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 2 / 6 | Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Sultan Hassan Alamri: h-index 14 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | King Abdulaziz University: institution h-index 560 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41378346) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 35 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1638022
- PubMed: 41378346
- Original source →
- Free full text: Frontiers in Neuroscience →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Bayahya, A. Y., Jammal, F., Banjar, H. R., Eassa, F. E., Talabay, O., & Alamri, S. H. (2025). Multi-model deep learning for dementia detection: addressing data and model limitations. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1638022
Vancouver
Bayahya AY, Jammal F, Banjar HR, Eassa FE, Talabay O, Alamri SH. Multi-model deep learning for dementia detection: addressing data and model limitations. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2025. doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1638022. PMID: 41378346.
BibTeX
@article{bayahya2025-41378346,
author = {Bayahya, Areej Y. and Jammal, Fares and Banjar, Haneen Reda and Eassa, Fathy Elbouraey and Talabay, Omar and Alamri, Sultan Hassan},
title = {{Multi-model deep learning for dementia detection: addressing data and model limitations}},
journal = {Frontiers in Neuroscience},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.3389/fnins.2025.1638022},
pmid = {41378346},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1638022}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.