Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 61 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Objectives To understand how commonly diminution of verbal repetition was a goal of treatment in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), how commonly that goal was achieved, whether goal attainment might be attributable to galantamine treatment, and whether change in verbal repetition is a marker of the overall treatment response. Methods This is a secondary analysis of the Video-Imaging Synthesis of Treating Alzheimer's Disease study, a 4-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine in 130 community-dwelling patients with mild to moderate AD. The primary outcome was Goal Attainment Scaling, in which individualized problems identified by patients/caregivers and treating physicians were assessed bimonthly. Results Reduction of verbal repetition was set as a treatment goal in 44% (n = 57) of randomized patients. More patients/caregivers (32%) set repetition goals than did physicians (18%). After 4 months, more galantamine-treated patients showed diminution of verbal repetition (58%) than did placebo-treated patients (24%; p Conclusions Reduction of verbal repetition is a common goal of Alzheimer disease treatment. After 4 months, patients treated with galantamine were more likely to experience a reduction of verbal repetition than those treated with placebo. Diminution of verbal repetition was associated with other improvements, suggesting it might be a clinical marker of a positive treatment response.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Rockwood, K., Fay, S., Jarrett, P., & Asp, E. (2007). Effect of galantamine on verbal repetition in AD: a secondary analysis of the VISTA trial. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000258661.61577.b7

Vancouver

Rockwood K, Fay S, Jarrett P, Asp E. Effect of galantamine on verbal repetition in AD: a secondary analysis of the VISTA trial. Neurology. 2007. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000258661.61577.b7. PMID: 17404193.

BibTeX

@article{rockwood2007-17404193,
  author  = {Rockwood, K. and Fay, S. and Jarrett, P. and Asp, E.},
  title   = {{Effect of galantamine on verbal repetition in AD: a secondary analysis of the VISTA trial}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2007},
  doi     = {10.1212/01.wnl.0000258661.61577.b7},
  pmid    = {17404193},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000258661.61577.b7}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this secondary analysis of a 4-month trial, more galantamine-treated patients had a reduction in verbal repetition than placebo-treated patients. This concerns a specific symptom goal in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and does not show that galantamine cures or prevents it.

Study details

How this study scored 61/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 61 of 100.61 of 100 points earned39 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomized controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomized controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2007 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 57 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 2 / 2 Randomized and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 50 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.4 citations a year over 21 year(s) since 2007
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Elissa Asp: h-index 8 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Dalhousie University: institution h-index 778 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 17404193)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 61 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “trial”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “trial”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →