Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 79 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in older people. One approach to symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease is to enhance cholinergic neurotransmission in the brain by blocking the action of the enzyme responsible for the breakdown of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. This can be done by a group of drugs known as cholinesterase inhibitors.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Birks, J. S., & Harvey, R. J. (2018). Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001190.pub3

Vancouver

Birks JS, Harvey RJ. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001190.pub3. PMID: 29923184.

BibTeX

@article{birks2018-29923184,
  author  = {Birks, J. S. and Harvey, R. J.},
  title   = {{Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {The Cochrane database of systematic reviews},
  year    = {2018},
  doi     = {10.1002/14651858.cd001190.pub3},
  pmid    = {29923184},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001190.pub3}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This Cochrane review, "an updated version of a review first published in 1998", set out to assess the "clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil in people with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease", to compare doses, and to assess effects on "healthcare resource use and costs". Donepezil is a cholinesterase inhibitor, which the review describes as a "symptomatic treatment" that boosts the brain chemical acetylcholine; it is not presented as a cure or prevention. The record we hold contains only the review's background and aims, not its results, so see the original for what it found.

Study details

How this study scored 79/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 57 of the 72 points it could be judged on, which is 79 of 100. Total 79 of 100.57 of the 72 points we could judge = 79 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here and still being cited, so those were left out: it earned 57 of the 72 points we could judge it on, which is 79 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (The Cochrane database of systematic reviews)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: journal h-index 468 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2018 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 8,257 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomization is not credited here
Times cited — / 7 Citation count not trusted: 13 of 43 library studies citing it were published more than a year before it - a sign OpenAlex merged several works under this DOI — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Library citations not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Richard J. Harvey: h-index 26 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Oxford: institution h-index 2,205 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 29923184)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 57 / 72 Scored on 15 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 57 of the 72 points we could judge it on is 79 out of 100.
Total 79 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 33.

Later studies that cite this one

43 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “trial”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “trial”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →