Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Although β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) and secretase inhibitors did not achieve success in clinical trials because of mechanism-based toxicity and cognitive impairment, new monoclonal antibodies such as lecanemab and donanemab have shown high amyloid plaque clearance and reduced cognitive deterioration. Nevertheless, the treatments are associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). In addition to amyloid, studies are focusing on tau hyperphosphorylation, neuroinflammation through triggering receptor on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) and NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) and growth factor-mediated synaptic plasticity through brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). AD treatment has entered the new era that demands a paradigm shift from monotherapies to multi-target cocktails. The future lies in precision neuropharmacology, where genetic stratification and individual biomarker analysis are used to provide the correct treatment at the most appropriate biological stage.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review notes that lecanemab and donanemab clear amyloid plaques and reduce cognitive deterioration but are associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, while BACE1 and secretase inhibitors failed in trials. It argues that treatment should move toward multi-target combinations and precision neuropharmacology, which remains a future direction rather than an established approach.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 37 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 39 of 100. Total 39 of 100.37 of the 96 points we could judge = 39 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 37 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Neurology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Neurology: journal h-index 208 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 12.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Fady A. Malaak holds only 7 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 University of Hertfordshire: institution h-index 382 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42084750)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 37 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 37 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100.
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Hafez, M. M., Abbas, H. A., Shoman, N. A., Soubh, A. A., Aly, O., Sallam, M. F., et al. (2026). A new era in neuropharmacology: assessing the efficacy and safety of novel anti-amyloid and non-amyloid drug targets for Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-13829-7

Vancouver

Hafez MM, Abbas HA, Shoman NA, Soubh AA, Aly O, Sallam MF, et al. A new era in neuropharmacology: assessing the efficacy and safety of novel anti-amyloid and non-amyloid drug targets for Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neurology. 2026. doi:10.1007/s00415-026-13829-7. PMID: 42084750.

BibTeX

@article{hafez2026-42084750,
  author  = {Hafez, Mohamed Mahmoud and Abbas, Haidy A. and Shoman, Nabil A. and Soubh, Ayman A. and Aly, Omnia and Sallam, Mohamed F. and Seliem, Mahmoud A. and Malaak, Fady A.},
  title   = {{A new era in neuropharmacology: assessing the efficacy and safety of novel anti-amyloid and non-amyloid drug targets for Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Journal of Neurology},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1007/s00415-026-13829-7},
  pmid    = {42084750},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-13829-7}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 37.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →