Home › Research › Biomarkers
CSF Aβ42 predicts early-onset dementia in Parkinson disease
Alves G, Lange J, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Andreasson U, Førland MG, Tysnes OB, Larsen JP et al.. Neurology, 2014-04-18
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
Objective To test in vivo the proposal from clinicopathologic studies that β-amyloid (Aβ) pathology shortens the time to dementia in Parkinson disease (PD), and to explore the utility of CSF Aβ and related measures as early prognostic biomarkers of dementia in an incident PD cohort. Methods We assessed a population-based incident cohort of 104 patients with PD who underwent lumbar puncture at diagnosis. We analyzed CSF concentrations of Aβ42, Aβ40, and Aβ38 using a multiplexed immunoassay with electrochemiluminescence (ECL) detection and levels of Aβ42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau using ELISA. Patients were followed prospectively for 5 years. Dementia was diagnosed according to published criteria. Results CSF levels of Aβ42 were significantly decreased in patients who developed dementia (n = 20, 19.2%) compared to those who did not (n = 84, 80.8%), as measured by ECL (-33%, p = 0.006) as well as ELISA (-36%, p < 0.001). No differences were observed for other markers. Low Aβ42 values predicted a substantially increased risk for subsequent dementia at high sensitivity (≥ 85%), with hazard ratios of 9.9 (95% confidence interval 2.3-43.5, p = 0.002) for Aβ42ECL <376 pg/mL and 7.6 (2.2-26.4, p = 0.001) for Aβ42ELISA <443 pg/mL, after adjustment for baseline age and PD-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) status. Aβ42 reductions tended to precede the onset of PD-MCI that progressed to dementia. Conclusions These in vivo data support the role of Aβ pathology in the etiology and highlight the potential utility of CSF Aβ42 as an early prognostic biomarker of dementia associated with PD.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Alves, G., Lange, J., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Andreasson, U., Førland, M. G., et al. (2014). CSF Aβ42 predicts early-onset dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000000425
Vancouver
Alves G, Lange J, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Andreasson U, Førland MG, et al. CSF Aβ42 predicts early-onset dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2014. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000425. PMID: 24748671.
BibTeX
@article{alves2014-24748671,
author = {Alves, G. and Lange, J. and Blennow, K. and Zetterberg, H. and Andreasson, U. and Førland, M. G. and Tysnes, O. B. and Larsen, J. P. and others},
title = {{CSF Aβ42 predicts early-onset dementia in Parkinson disease}},
journal = {Neurology},
year = {2014},
doi = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000000425},
pmid = {24748671},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000000425}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results CSF levels of Aβ42 were significantly decreased in patients who developed dementia (n = 20, 19.2%) compared to those who did not (n = 84, 80.8%), as measured by ECL (-33%, p = 0.006) as well as ELISA (-36%, p < 0.001).
- Low Aβ42 values predicted a substantially increased risk for subsequent dementia at high sensitivity (≥ 85%), with hazard ratios of 9.9 (95% confidence interval 2.3-43.5, p = 0.002) for Aβ42ECL <376 pg/mL and 7.6 (2.2-26.4, p = 0.001) for Aβ42ELISA <443 pg/mL, after adjustment for baseline age and PD-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) status.
- Conclusions These in vivo data support the role of Aβ pathology in the etiology and highlight the potential utility of CSF Aβ42 as an early prognostic biomarker of dementia associated with PD.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Participants20
- Effect size19.2%; 80.8%
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 53/100
Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 31 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 53 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2014 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 1 / 4 | 20 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 24748671) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 31 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 53 out of 100. |
| Total | 53 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also tagged “p-tau217”
692 studies in the library carry the topic tag “p-tau217”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 692 tagged studies.