Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Vascular contributions

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

A total of 44 experts participated in 3 survey rounds, with 28 to 31 participants each. Consensus was reached on a core assessment battery of neuropsychological tests based on key cognitive domains, and additional guidelines for a more comprehensive test battery, cognitive screening, telehealth and computerized assessment methods, principles for normative standardization, and the assessment of diverse populations. The key cognitive domains were harmonized with the International Society for Vascular Behavioural and Cognitive Disorders version 2 World Stroke Organization (VasCog-2-WSO) diagnostic criteria for VCID. Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus statement describes the development of a harmonized neuropsychological assessment battery and guidelines for VCID (VasCog-NP) that expands on the NINDS-CSN battery with more comprehensive and flexible assessment of VCID. Harmonized with the VasCog-2-WSO diagnostic criteria, VasCog-NP could be adopted internationally to further help more consistent neuropsychological evaluations related to VCID, facilitating global comparisons for clinicians and researchers.

Key findings

Why it matters

This consensus statement describes a harmonized neuropsychological assessment battery and guidelines for vascular cognitive impairment and dementia, developed by 44 experts. It aims to make evaluations more consistent worldwide for clinicians and researchers, not to test a treatment.

Study details

How this study scored 51/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 51 of 100.51 of 100 points earned49 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA Network Open)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 JAMA Network Open: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 31 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 11 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 7.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 11 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Perminder Singh Sachdev: h-index 147 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Michigan: institution h-index 2,240 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 37 institution(s) in 12 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41364442)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 51 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Bentvelzen, A. C., Kochan, N. A., Saks, D., Chander, R. J., Koncz, R., Aam, S., et al. (2025). Consensus-Harmonized Neuropsychological Assessment for Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. JAMA Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.47948

Vancouver

Bentvelzen AC, Kochan NA, Saks D, Chander RJ, Koncz R, Aam S, et al. Consensus-Harmonized Neuropsychological Assessment for Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. JAMA Network Open. 2025. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.47948. PMID: 41364442.

BibTeX

@article{bentvelzen2025-41364442,
  author  = {Bentvelzen, Adam C. and Kochan, Nicole A. and Saks, Danit and Chander, Russell Jude and Koncz, Rebecca and Aam, Stina and Alves, Gilberto Sousa and Briceño, Emily M. and others},
  title   = {{Consensus-Harmonized Neuropsychological Assessment for Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia}},
  journal = {JAMA Network Open},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.47948},
  pmid    = {41364442},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.47948}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 24.

Related studies in Vascular contributions

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Vascular contributions

See all studies in Vascular contributions →