Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 35 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract Working on a risk-adjusted, prospective, capitated payment system, Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are incentivized to offer more efficient and coordinated care than traditional Medicare (TM). This study has two aims: (1) compare the continuity of care and use of annual wellness visits between MA and TM enrollees with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia (ADRD), and (2) examine Hispanic-White and Black-White disparities in the continuity of care and annual wellness visits by comparing MA with TM enrollees with ADRD. We used a 20% random sample of TM and MA insurance claims (2018-2019). Participants included individuals 65+, with a diagnosis of ADRD, and two years of continuous enrollment in TM (n=129,177) or MA (n=119,130). We used the Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care Index to measure continuity of care. Generalized linear models were applied. TM lowered the odds of Black and Hispanic individuals having an annual wellness visit [OR=.80 (95% CI:.79-.82)]. Black and Hispanic TM enrollees had lower odds of annual wellness visits as compared to their Black and Hispanic MA counterparts [OR=.83 (95% CI:78-.88) and OR=.88 (95% CI:.83-.94)], respectively. White, Black, and Hispanic MA enrollees had higher continuity of care than their counterparts in TM (27.4 vs. 24.9; 28.9 vs. 28.1; 32.1 vs. 30.1, respectively). MA enrollees with ADRD had higher care continuity than their TM counterparts. Compared to TM, MA increased the odds of annual wellness visits and reduced Hispanic-White disparity in annual wellness visits. Findings from this study can inform policies promoting preventive and equitable care for patients with ADRD.

Key findings

Why it matters

Medicare Advantage enrollees with ADRD had higher continuity of care than Traditional Medicare enrollees, and Traditional Medicare lowered the odds of Black and Hispanic beneficiaries having an annual wellness visit. This is about care delivery and disparities by insurance type, not about treating, curing or preventing the disease.

Study details

How this study scored 35/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 35 of 100.35 of 100 points earned65 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Innovation in Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Innovation in Aging: journal h-index 48 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 129,177 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Elham Mahmoudi: h-index 29 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Michigan: institution h-index 2,240 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 35 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Mahmoudi, E. (2023). DISPARITIES IN CONTINUITY OF CARE AND USE OF ANNUAL WELLNESS VISITS AMONG OLDER AMERICANS WITH DEMENTIA. Innovation in Aging. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.0695

Vancouver

Mahmoudi E. DISPARITIES IN CONTINUITY OF CARE AND USE OF ANNUAL WELLNESS VISITS AMONG OLDER AMERICANS WITH DEMENTIA. Innovation in Aging. 2023. doi:10.1093/geroni/igad104.0695.

BibTeX

@article{mahmoudi2023-5b2f8c43,
  author  = {Mahmoudi, Elham},
  title   = {{DISPARITIES IN CONTINUITY OF CARE AND USE OF ANNUAL WELLNESS VISITS AMONG OLDER AMERICANS WITH DEMENTIA}},
  journal = {Innovation in Aging},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1093/geroni/igad104.0695},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.0695}
}

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →