Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 42 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

The subdivisions exhibit different pathways, terminations, and structural characteristics. We found differences in almost all the diffusivity metrics among the subdivisions (p < 0.001 for all the metrics) and between AD versus CN and MCI versus CN subjects for mean diffusivity (p = 0.007-0.038), radial diffusivity (p = 0.008-0.049) and neurite dispersion index (p = 0.005-0.049). Results from tractography analysis of the subdivisions of the cingulum bundle showed an association in the role of groups of fibers with their functions and the variance of their properties in relation to dementia progression. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The cingulum bundle is a complex tract with several pathways and terminations related to many cognitive functions. A probabilistic automatic approach is proposed to reconstruct its subdivisions, showing different microstructural properties and variations. A larger sample of patients is needed to confirm results and elucidate the role of diffusion parameters in characterizing alterations in brain function and progression to dementia. KEY POINTS: The microstructure of the cingulum bundle is related to brain cognitive functions. A probabilistic automatic approach is proposed to reconstruct the subdivisions of the cingulum bundle by diffusion-weighted images. The subdivisions showed different microstructural properties and variations in relation to the progression of dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Ricchi, M., Campani, G., Nagmutdinova, A., Bortolotti, V., Greco, D., Golini, C., et al. (2025). Connectivity related to major brain functions in Alzheimer disease progression: microstructural properties of the cingulum bundle and its subdivision using diffusion-weighted MRI. European Radiology Experimental. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-025-00570-5

Vancouver

Ricchi M, Campani G, Nagmutdinova A, Bortolotti V, Greco D, Golini C, et al. Connectivity related to major brain functions in Alzheimer disease progression: microstructural properties of the cingulum bundle and its subdivision using diffusion-weighted MRI. European Radiology Experimental. 2025. doi:10.1186/s41747-025-00570-5. PMID: 40106095.

BibTeX

@article{ricchi2025-40106095,
  author  = {Ricchi, Mattia and Campani, Guido and Nagmutdinova, Anastasiia and Bortolotti, Villiam and Greco, Danilo and Golini, Carlo and Grist, James T. and Brizi, Leonardo and others},
  title   = {{Connectivity related to major brain functions in Alzheimer disease progression: microstructural properties of the cingulum bundle and its subdivision using diffusion-weighted MRI}},
  journal = {European Radiology Experimental},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1186/s41747-025-00570-5},
  pmid    = {40106095},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-025-00570-5}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found microstructural differences in subdivisions of the cingulum bundle between Alzheimer disease, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively normal subjects. The authors state that a larger sample is needed to confirm results and clarify the role of diffusion parameters in progression to dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 42/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 42 of 100.42 of 100 points earned58 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (European Radiology Experimental)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 European Radiology Experimental: journal h-index 50 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 10 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 10 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Claudia M. Testa: h-index 52 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Oxford: institution h-index 2,205 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40106095)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 42 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “machine”

834 studies in the library carry the topic tag “machine”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 834 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →