Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background Group comparison results associating cortical thinning and Parkinson disease (PD) dementia (PDD) are limited in their application to clinical settings. Purpose To investigate whether cortical thickness from MRI can help predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia in PD at an individual level using a machine learning-based model. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, patients with PD and MCI who underwent MRI from September 2008 to November 2016 were included. Features were selected from clinical and cortical thickness variables in 10 000 randomly generated training sets. Features selected 5000 times or more were used to train random forest and support vector machine models. Each model was trained and tested in 10 000 randomly resampled data sets, and a median of 10 000 areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) was calculated for each. Model performances were validated in an external test set. Results Forty-two patients progressed to PDD (converters) (mean age, 71 years ± 6 [standard deviation]; 22 women), and 75 patients did not progress to PDD (nonconverters) (mean age, 68 years ± 6; 40 women). Four PDD converters (mean age, 74 years ± 10; four men) and 20 nonconverters (mean age, 67 years ± 7; 11 women) were included in the external test set. Models trained with cortical thickness variables (AUC range, 0.75-0.83) showed fair to good performances similar to those trained with clinical variables (AUC range, 0.70-0.81). Model performances improved when models were trained with both variables (AUC range, 0.80-0.88). In pair-wise comparisons, models trained with both variables more frequently showed better performance than others in all model types. The models trained with both variables were successfully validated in the external test set (AUC range, 0.69-0.84). Conclusion Cortical thickness from MRI helped predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia in Parkinson disease at an individual level, with improved performance when integrated with clinical variables. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Port in this issue.

Key findings

Why it matters

A machine learning model using cortical thickness from MRI helped predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia in Parkinson's disease. It is a prediction study and reports no treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 46 of 100.46 of 100 points earned54 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Radiology)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Radiology: journal h-index 431 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 75 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 51 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 7.3 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 34 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Seung‐Koo Lee: h-index 60 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Yonsei University: institution h-index 777 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34032515)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Shin, N. Y., Bang, M., Yoo, S. W., Kim, J. S., Yun, E., Yoon, U., et al. (2021). Cortical Thickness from MRI to Predict Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia in Parkinson Disease: A Machine Learning-based Model. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021203383

Vancouver

Shin NY, Bang M, Yoo SW, Kim JS, Yun E, Yoon U, et al. Cortical Thickness from MRI to Predict Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia in Parkinson Disease: A Machine Learning-based Model. Radiology. 2021. doi:10.1148/radiol.2021203383. PMID: 34032515.

BibTeX

@article{shin2021-34032515,
  author  = {Shin, N. Y. and Bang, M. and Yoo, S. W. and Kim, J. S. and Yun, E. and Yoon, U. and Han, K. and Ahn, K. J. and others},
  title   = {{Cortical Thickness from MRI to Predict Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia in Parkinson Disease: A Machine Learning-based Model}},
  journal = {Radiology},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1148/radiol.2021203383},
  pmid    = {34032515},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021203383}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →