Home › Research › Biomarkers
Combination of plasma biomarkers and clinical data for the detection of sporadic Alzheimer's disease
Han Y, Jia J, Jia XF, Qin W, Wang S.. Neuroscience letters, 2012-04-07
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Amyloid β and alpha 1-antichymotrypsin (ACT) play an important role in the pathogenesis of sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present study was to investigate whether a combination of plasma biomarkers and clinical data would discriminate AD from vascular dementia, other neurodegenerative dementia and non-demented controls. The study included 112 patients with AD, 85 patients with vascular dementia, 30 patients with other neurodegenerative dementia and 116 age-matched, non-demented controls. Although ACT, Aβ42 and the ratio of Aβ42/Aβ40 had significant differences between AD, vascular dementia, other neurodegenerative dementia and non-demented controls (P<0.001), none of them reached the sensitivity and specificity required for AD biomarkers. The combination of biomarkers and clinical data had higher discriminating power than either alone. Our results indicated that plasma biomarkers of ACT and the ratio of Aβ42/Aβ40 could discriminate AD from non-demented controls, vascular dementia, or other neurodegenerative dementias with higher diagnostic accuracy than clinical data and that if plasma biomarkers were combined with clinical data, the discriminating power was enhanced.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Han, Y., Jia, J., Jia, X. F., Qin, W., & Wang, S. (2012). Combination of plasma biomarkers and clinical data for the detection of sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.094
Vancouver
Han Y, Jia J, Jia XF, Qin W, Wang S. Combination of plasma biomarkers and clinical data for the detection of sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience letters. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.094. PMID: 22503901.
BibTeX
@article{han2012-22503901,
author = {Han, Y. and Jia, J. and Jia, X. F. and Qin, W. and Wang, S.},
title = {{Combination of plasma biomarkers and clinical data for the detection of sporadic Alzheimer's disease}},
journal = {Neuroscience letters},
year = {2012},
doi = {10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.094},
pmid = {22503901},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.094}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Although ACT, Aβ42 and the ratio of Aβ42/Aβ40 had significant differences between AD, vascular dementia, other neurodegenerative dementia and non-demented controls (P<0.001), none of them reached the sensitivity and specificity required for AD biomarkers.
- Our results indicated that plasma biomarkers of ACT and the ratio of Aβ42/Aβ40 could discriminate AD from non-demented controls, vascular dementia, or other neurodegenerative dementias with higher diagnostic accuracy than clinical data and that if plasma biomarkers were combined with clinical data, the discriminating power was enhanced.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Participants112
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 45/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuroscience letters) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2012 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 112 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 22503901) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 26 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100. |
| Total | 45 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also tagged “sporadic”
4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “sporadic”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.