Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) disproportionately impact older Black American adults, with diet-related cardiometabolic conditions contributing to increased risk. Using a community-based research approach, we co-developed the MIND+SOUL intervention to promote culturally tailored dietary modifications that align with traditional food practices and faith-based values. We built early partnerships with trusted community leaders and organizations to build relevance and trust. Focus groups and validated surveys explored dietary behaviors, food security, and barriers to healthy eating. Community partners guided the development of nutrition education, culturally adapted meal planning, and strategies for spiritual engagement. Feedback was continuously incorporated through shared decision-making, regular planning sessions, and co-led activities. This process highlights how a community-based research approach can adequately guide the design of a culturally tailored intervention that incorporates community values and specific needs. Preliminary findings suggest high engagement and improved dietary intake, including increased consumption of brain-healthy foods. Barriers such as affordability and food access emphasize the need for continued community support. MIND+SOUL demonstrates how participatory methods can be used to develop culturally relevant dietary interventions that support ADRD risk reduction in older Black American adults.

Key findings

Why it matters

The MIND+SOUL program co-developed a culturally tailored dietary intervention with community partners for older Black American adults at risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Preliminary findings suggest high engagement and improved dietary intake, but this is early work and does not yet show that the program prevents dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 32/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 32 of 100.32 of 100 points earned68 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Participatory Research Methods)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Journal of Participatory Research Methods: journal h-index 17 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Jeffrey Murray Burns: h-index 83 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of California, Irvine: institution h-index 1,195 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 32 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Shaw, A. R., Perales‐Puchalt, J., Sandoval, R., Glover, C. M., Berkley‐Patton, J., Vidoni, E. D., et al. (2026). Co-Developing a Culturally Tailored Dietary Intervention for ADRD Risk Reduction Using a Community-Based Research Approach: The MIND+SOUL Program. Journal of Participatory Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.141305

Vancouver

Shaw AR, Perales‐Puchalt J, Sandoval R, Glover CM, Berkley‐Patton J, Vidoni ED, et al. Co-Developing a Culturally Tailored Dietary Intervention for ADRD Risk Reduction Using a Community-Based Research Approach: The MIND+SOUL Program. Journal of Participatory Research Methods. 2026. doi:10.35844/001c.141305.

BibTeX

@article{shaw2026-7f993fc1,
  author  = {Shaw, Ashley R. and Perales‐Puchalt, Jaime and Sandoval, Rachel and Glover, Crystal M. and Berkley‐Patton, Jannette and Vidoni, Eric D. and Burns, Jeffrey Murray},
  title   = {{Co-Developing a Culturally Tailored Dietary Intervention for ADRD Risk Reduction Using a Community-Based Research Approach: The MIND+SOUL Program}},
  journal = {Journal of Participatory Research Methods},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.35844/001c.141305},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.141305}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also in Risk factors

356 studies in the library are filed under Risk factors with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Risk factors hub.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →