Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

In medical school, students learn to view the world through a biomedical lens. While necessary clinically, this lens can be impersonal. For example, the mental status examination (MSE) evaluates cognitive function through a brief assessment of alertness and orientation to person, place, time, and situation. While clinically useful, the MSE often neglects to capture a person's individuality. Visiting my grandmother who has Alzheimer disease highlighted this tension. I juxtaposed the impersonality of our MSE orientation scale with my grandmother's lived experiences. My grandmother is identified using a pseudonym. Informed consent was obtained from her health care power of attorney and family.Birds twitter and chirp as they flit into the shade,the covered patio a respite from the morning's heat.I sit with Joanna and show her a painting:an apple, red peppers, a garlic clove, and a grapefruitrest on a white napkin.Produce so vibrant the napkin is stainedwith their vivid reflections.The wrinkles around her eyes deepen as she squints at the picture.She always liked to see my artwork.Bright colors illuminate the lines of confusion on her face.Where did you get all this food?We're rationing for the war to stop Hitler.I have evaluated dementia:limited treatment options, behavioral interventions.Cognitive changes alterorientation to self,place, time, situation.Joanna and I sit on the memory care patio.The birdfeeder dances in the humid summer air.I've shared my artwork with Grandma Jofrom crayons' waxy scrawlto crisp acrylic colors.Today a t-shirt replaces my white coat.The war is over, grandma.The produce is from a grocery store.I redirect with another painting.This is a bridge in a park-She smiles: it's New York City, I miss going there.In the middle of Central Park,a cement bridge in a grassy parkspans a wide, still pond.Today, the colors of the bridge,reflected on the water,spark a glimmer of my grandmother.This time she knows the memory is in the past,as she tells me about New York in the Forties.With the beating of sparrow wings,the moment of clarity endsas past and present are blended again.When the sun sinks, my visit will fade.I clutch what happenedoutside, away from the clinical setting.What we cannot quantifywith A&O x1: oriented to self.

Key findings

Why it matters

This personal essay describes how the standard mental status exam can miss a person's individuality, illustrated through the author's grandmother who has Alzheimer's disease. It is a reflection on clinical practice and does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 32/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 31 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 32 of 100. Total 32 of 100.31 of the 96 points we could judge = 32 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 31 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 32 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Kristin Geczi holds only 6 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Michigan: institution h-index 2,240 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 36443014)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 31 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 32 out of 100.
Total 32 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Kristin, G. (2023). Right Brain: Oriented to Self. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201602

Vancouver

Kristin G. Right Brain: Oriented to Self. Neurology. 2023. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000201602. PMID: 36443014.

BibTeX

@article{kristin2023-36443014,
  author  = {Kristin, Geczi},
  title   = {{Right Brain: Oriented to Self}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1212/WNL.0000000000201602},
  pmid    = {36443014},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201602}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →