Home › Research › Digital health tools
Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome
Chapman RS, Hesketh LJ.. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 2000-01-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Evidence is reviewed for a developmentally-emerging behavioral phenotype in individuals with Down syndrome that includes significant delay in nonverbal cognitive development accompanied by additional, specific deficits in speech, language production, and auditory short-term memory in infancy and childhood, but fewer adaptive behavior problems than individuals with other cognitive disabilities. Evidence of dementia emerges for up to half the individuals studied after age 50. Research issues affecting control group selection in establishing phenotypic characteristics are discussed, as well as the possible genetic mechanisms underlying variation in general cognitive delay, specific language impairment, and adult dementia. MRDD Research Reviews 2000;6:84-95. Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Chapman, R. S., & Hesketh, L. J. (2000). Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:2<84::aid-mrdd2>3.0.co;2-p
Vancouver
Chapman RS, Hesketh LJ. Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews. 2000. doi:10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:2<84::aid-mrdd2>3.0.co;2-p. PMID: 10899801.
BibTeX
@article{chapman2000-10899801,
author = {Chapman, R. S. and Hesketh, L. J.},
title = {{Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome}},
journal = {Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews},
year = {2000},
doi = {10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:2<84::aid-mrdd2>3.0.co;2-p},
pmid = {10899801},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:2<84::aid-mrdd2>3.0.co;2-p}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Evidence is reviewed for a developmentally-emerging behavioral phenotype in individuals with Down syndrome that includes significant delay in nonverbal cognitive development accompanied by additional, specific deficits in speech, language production, and auditory short-term memory in infancy and childhood, but fewer adaptive behavior problems than individuals with other cognitive disabilities.
Why it matters
This 2000 review describes a developmental profile seen in Down syndrome: significant delay in nonverbal thinking skills, plus specific weaknesses in speech, language production and auditory short-term memory in childhood, though with fewer everyday adaptive-behaviour problems than in other cognitive disabilities. It reports that evidence of dementia appears in up to half of the individuals studied after age 50, which is why this group matters to Alzheimer's research. It discusses possible genetic explanations and the difficulty of choosing comparison groups, but it reports no new trial and tests no treatment or prevention.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 43/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews: journal h-index 120 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2000 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 6 / 7 | Cited 660 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 4 / 5 | 23.6 citations a year over 28 year(s) since 2000 |
| Impact for its field and year | 3 / 6 | Cited 7.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 2 / 6 | Cited by 6 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 3 / 4 | Cited 55 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Linda J. Hesketh: h-index 14 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | University of Wisconsin–Madison: institution h-index 1,518 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 0 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete) |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 10899801) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Total | 43 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
6 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also tagged “down”
527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.