Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test for Children (RBMT-C) was used to assess a population-based sample of 74 people with Down syndrome (DS) aged 30 years and over (range 30-65 years) living in the Cambridge health district. Given the high age-specific risk of Alzheimer-like neuropathology in people with DS, the aim of this study was to determine whether this test provided a suitable measure of memory function in an older population of adults with DS who were at the age of risk for Alzheimer's disease. We also investigated whether there was a significant difference in everyday memory performance between different age, gender and day-centre groups. The level of learning disability in our sample ranged from mild, through severe to profound. Individuals with severe or profound learning disability were virtually untestable on this and other cognitive tests, but for the remaining two-thirds of the group, the RBMT-C could be used to assess memory function. Significant differences in memory function were found between younger (30-44 years) and older (45+ years) participants. Performance also varied between groups (e.g. from different day centres), illustrating the importance of population-based samples when determining the value of such tests. Ongoing longitudinal studies are required to establish the extent to which the RBMT-C is useful in assessing change in retrospective and prospective memory.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Hon, J., Huppert, F. A., Holland, A. J., & Watson, P. (1998). The value of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (Children's Version) in an epidemiological study of older adults with Down syndrome. The British journal of clinical psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01276.x

Vancouver

Hon J, Huppert FA, Holland AJ, Watson P. The value of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (Children's Version) in an epidemiological study of older adults with Down syndrome. The British journal of clinical psychology. 1998. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01276.x. PMID: 9547957.

BibTeX

@article{hon1998-9547957,
  author  = {Hon, J. and Huppert, F. A. and Holland, A. J. and Watson, P.},
  title   = {{The value of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (Children's Version) in an epidemiological study of older adults with Down syndrome}},
  journal = {The British journal of clinical psychology},
  year    = {1998},
  doi     = {10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01276.x},
  pmid    = {9547957},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01276.x}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study assessed whether a children's memory test could measure memory function in older adults with Down syndrome who are at risk for Alzheimer's disease. It found the test was usable for about two-thirds of the group and that memory differed between younger and older participants, but it does not test any treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 46 of 100.46 of 100 points earned54 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The British journal of clinical psychology)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 British Journal of Clinical Psychology: journal h-index 146 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1998 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 1 / 4 74 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 29 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 30 year(s) since 1998
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Peter Watson: h-index 46 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Cambridge: institution h-index 1,973 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 9547957)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Also tagged “down”

527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

See all studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's →