Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. How common it is

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

Among a cohort of 118 006 individuals, the incident rate (IR) of dementia was 0.56/1000 person-years over a median follow-up period of 1.54 years among SGLT-2i users compared with 2.67/1000 person-years in DPP-4i users, over a median follow-up period of 1.79 years. The adjusted HR for SGLT-2i use compared with DPP-4i use for dementia was 0.78 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.12), while for MCI was 0.86 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.92). The age-specific stratified analysis demonstrated the adjusted HR for SGLT-2i use compared with DPP-4i use for the risk of incident dementia among elderly, aged ≥65 years, was 0.50 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.80). Primary findings did not yield conclusive evidence to infer an association between SGLT-2i use and the risk of incident dementia.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Moderate

This is a follow-up (cohort) study. Comparing SGLT-2i users with DPP-4i users, the study found no conclusive evidence of an association between SGLT-2i use and incident dementia overall. A lower risk was seen in the subgroup aged 65 and older, but the authors state the primary findings do not allow a firm conclusion.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Abdullah, Z., Cui, Y., Platt, R. W., Renoux, C., Azoulay, L., Xia, C., et al. (2025). Association between use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor and the risk of incident dementia: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004541

Vancouver

Abdullah Z, Cui Y, Platt RW, Renoux C, Azoulay L, Xia C, et al. Association between use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor and the risk of incident dementia: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care. 2025. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004541. PMID: 39842866.

BibTeX

@article{abdullah2025-39842866,
  author  = {Abdullah, Zarin and Cui, Ying and Platt, Robert William and Renoux, Christel and Azoulay, Laurent and Xia, Chenjie and Yu, Oriana Hoi Yun},
  title   = {{Association between use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor and the risk of incident dementia: a population-based cohort study}},
  journal = {BMJ Open Diabetes Research \& Care},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004541},
  pmid    = {39842866},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004541}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Comparing SGLT-2i users with DPP-4i users, the study found no conclusive evidence of an association between SGLT-2i use and incident dementia overall. A lower risk was seen in the subgroup aged 65 and older, but the authors state the primary findings do not allow a firm conclusion.

Study details

How this study scored 49/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 49 of 100.49 of 100 points earned51 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care: journal h-index 85 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 11 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 6.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 11 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Oriana Hoi Yun Yu: h-index 35 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 McGill University: institution h-index 1,373 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39842866)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 49 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in How common it is from nearby years

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →