Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. How common it is

Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology

GCC countries are experiencing a rapid demographic transition. Life expectancy at birth has increased to between 76-80 years, and the elderly population is expected to double by 2050. This demographic transition is accompanied by a growing burden of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease, placing increasing demands on health and social care systems. This study examines three interconnected dimensions of the crisis: awareness of neurodegeneration among older people, the infrastructure and human capacity of care systems and the existing gaps that media, technology and community institutions might be able to bridge. Studies show that cognitive decline is frequently viewed as a natural consequence of aging rather than as a medical disorder that requires diagnosis and treatment. Limited health literacy, culturally constructed perceptions of health and illness, and use of informal support mechanisms, including family, religious, and community elders, could all be factors that influence the decision to seek health care. Stigma, limited awareness, and concerns about seeking institutional care may contribute to delays in diagnosis and treatment. On the care side, where families provide a substantial proportion of support for older adults, the region faces shortages of specialized professionals, including neurologists and geriatricians. Available care models are often fragmented and insufficiently integrated, while formal caregiver training and support remain limited in many settings, contributing to the burden on families. These results suggest that there may be room to enhance screening, referrals, and health literacy through increased coverage by mainstream media, collaborations with religious and community organizations, and broader implementation of telemedicine. Drawing on selected international examples from Japan, Sweden, Australia, and the United Kingdom, the paper proposes a multi-part policy framework comprising a national awareness campaign, strengthening of the geriatric healthcare workforce, a care provider certificate program, and digital health. The paper underlines the need for culturally appropriate, collaborative action to build more integrated and person-centered neurodegenerative care systems throughout the GCC.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 13 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 21 of 100. Raw total 21 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 21 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Preprints.org)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 13 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100.
Total 21 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Reddy, K. S., Jhansi, K., Khan, M. S., Robinson, B., Tyagi, K., & Khurana, S. (2026). Enhancing Neurodegeneration Awareness and Care for the Elderly in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Oman, and Qatar: Challenges, Policy Gaps, and Future Directions. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.1158.v1

Vancouver

Reddy KS, Jhansi K, Khan MS, Robinson B, Tyagi K, Khurana S. Enhancing Neurodegeneration Awareness and Care for the Elderly in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Oman, and Qatar: Challenges, Policy Gaps, and Future Directions. Preprints.org. 2026. doi:10.20944/preprints202610.1158.v1.

BibTeX

@article{reddy2026-fbf5aa8b,
  author  = {Reddy, K. S. and Jhansi, K. and Khan, M. S. and Robinson, B. and Tyagi, K. and Khurana, S.},
  title   = {{Enhancing Neurodegeneration Awareness and Care for the Elderly in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Oman, and Qatar: Challenges, Policy Gaps, and Future Directions}},
  journal = {Preprints.org},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.20944/preprints202610.1158.v1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.1158.v1}
}

Related studies in How common it is

Also tagged “costs”

265 studies in the library carry the topic tag “costs”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 265 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →