Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Over a median follow-up period of 4.33 years, 637 participants (7.27%) developed dementia. Compared with those who almost never engaged in outdoor activities, participants who engaged almost daily had a reduced risk of incident dementia by approximately 25% (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.92). Subgroup analyses showed significant associations in females and participants living in cities and towns, whereas no significant differences were observed between age groups. The sensitivity analysis yielded results consistent with the primary analysis. Frequent participation in individual outdoor activity may be associated with a reduced risk of dementia among the elderly in China. These findings support outdoor activity as a potential non-pharmaceutical strategy to delay cognitive decline and prevent dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Song, Y., Yu, Z., Lou, S., & Liu, D. (2025). Association between the Frequency of Individual Outdoor Activity and Risk of Incident Dementia in an Elderly Population in China: A National Cohort Study. Neuroepidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000548330

Vancouver

Song Y, Yu Z, Lou S, Liu D. Association between the Frequency of Individual Outdoor Activity and Risk of Incident Dementia in an Elderly Population in China: A National Cohort Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2025. doi:10.1159/000548330. PMID: 40996936.

BibTeX

@article{song2025-40996936,
  author  = {Song, Yizhu and Yu, Zihan and Lou, Shiyu and Liu, Dechen},
  title   = {{Association between the Frequency of Individual Outdoor Activity and Risk of Incident Dementia in an Elderly Population in China: A National Cohort Study}},
  journal = {Neuroepidemiology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1159/000548330},
  pmid    = {40996936},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1159/000548330}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this cohort, people who engaged in outdoor activities almost daily had about a 25% lower risk of developing dementia than those who almost never did. This observational link supports outdoor activity as a possible way to reduce dementia risk, but it cannot prove that activity itself causes the lower risk.

Study details

How this study scored 49/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 49 of 100.49 of 100 points earned51 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuroepidemiology)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Neuroepidemiology: journal h-index 125 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 8,758 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Dechen Liu: h-index 32 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine: institution h-index 123 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40996936)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 49 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Also tagged “incidence”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “incidence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →