Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 68 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background and objectives Lifestyle behaviors, including engagement in complex mental activities, have been associated with dementia risk and neuroimaging markers of aging and Alzheimer disease. However, the life period(s) at which lifestyle factors have the greatest influence on brain health remains unclear. Our objective was to determine the relative influence of lifestyle (i.e., engagement in complex mental activities) at different life periods on older adults' brain health. Methods This observational study included community-dwelling cognitively unimpaired seniors (older than 65 years) from the Age-Well randomized controlled trial (Caen, France). All participants completed at baseline the Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire, assessing engagement in complex mental activities during young adulthood (13-30 years: LEQ-young), midlife (30-65 years: LEQ-midlife), and late-life (older than 65 years: LEQ-late). LEQ scores were divided into specific and non-specific activities. Multiple regressions were conducted including LEQ scores at the 3 life periods (same model) to predict gray matter volume (GMv; structural-MRI), glucose metabolism (fluorodeoxyglucose-PET), perfusion (early-Florbetapir-PET), or amyloid burden (late-Florbetapir-PET), both in AD-signature regions and voxel-wise (significance for voxel-wise analyses: p uncorrected , k > 100). Correlations between LEQ and neuroimaging outcomes were then compared between (1) life periods and (2) specific and non-specific activities. Analyses were controlled for age and sex. Results In 135 older adults (mean age = 69.3 years; women = 61.5%), no associations were found within AD-signature regions (all p > 0.25). Voxel-wise analyses revealed no association between LEQ-young and neuroimaging. LEQ-midlife showed stronger voxel-wise associations than the other periods with GMv, notably in the anterior cingulate cortex, and with amyloid burden in the precuneus. These correlations were stronger for the LEQ-midlife specific (i.e., occupation) than the non-specific subscore (GMv: z = 3.25, p p p Discussion Lifestyle at different life periods may have complementary benefits on brain health in regions related to reserve/resilience in aging. While past (midlife) engagement could promote resistance against structural/pathologic alterations, current (late-life) engagement could enhance cognitive reserve. Future larger longitudinal studies should explore mechanisms by which lifestyle promotes reserve.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Turpin, A. L., Felisatti, F., Chauveau, L., Haudry, S., Mézenge, F., Landeau, B., et al. (2025). Association Between Lifestyle at Different Life Periods and Brain Integrity in Older Adults. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000213347

Vancouver

Turpin AL, Felisatti F, Chauveau L, Haudry S, Mézenge F, Landeau B, et al. Association Between Lifestyle at Different Life Periods and Brain Integrity in Older Adults. Neurology. 2025. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000213347. PMID: 39919257.

BibTeX

@article{turpin2025-39919257,
  author  = {Turpin, A. L. and Felisatti, F. and Chauveau, L. and Haudry, S. and Mézenge, F. and Landeau, B. and Vivien, D. and De La Sayette, V. and others},
  title   = {{Association Between Lifestyle at Different Life Periods and Brain Integrity in Older Adults}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000213347},
  pmid    = {39919257},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000213347}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 135 cognitively unimpaired older adults, engagement in complex mental activities at different life periods showed no association with brain imaging markers in Alzheimer's signature regions. This observational study does not support a link between these lifestyle activities and the brain measures examined.

Study details

How this study scored 68/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 65 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 68 of 100. Total 68 of 100.65 of the 96 points we could judge = 68 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 65 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 68 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Inserm: institution h-index 1,988 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39919257)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 65 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 65 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 68 out of 100.
Total 68 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “controlled”

1,116 studies in the library carry the topic tag “controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,116 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →