Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 68 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background and objectives Everyday functioning declines gradually over time in Alzheimer disease (AD), with the earliest changes potentially occurring at the preclinical stage. We investigated how changes in everyday functioning relate to (changes in) amyloid and tau in a large sample of cognitively unimpaired older adults, most of whom had elevated amyloid levels at the start of the study. Methods This prospective study included participants from a 240-week randomized controlled trial of an anti-amyloid drug, solanezumab, and individuals who screen-failed because of a negative amyloid PET scan. A subset (n = 434) underwent repeated tau PET scans. Participants and their study partners completed the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Prevention Instrument multiple times during the double-blind phase of the trial. Using generalized least-squares models, fit by restricted maximum likelihood, we analyzed how changes in everyday functioning related to amyloid and tau PET. We also correlated changes in amyloid and tau PET with changes in everyday functioning. Results A total of 1,707 participants (71.5 ± 4.7 years, 60% female) showed a marginal decline in everyday functioning. Among individuals with elevated amyloid, those with the highest levels of neocortical and medial temporal tau showed the largest decline in everyday functioning, as reported by the participants and their study partners. Increases in neocortical and medial temporal tau correlated moderately (correlation coefficient ranging from -0.2 to -0.5) with a decline in ADCS ADL-PI scores. Functional changes were not evident with amyloid alone. At the item level, participants and their study partners were most likely to report increased difficulty at the last visit with completing complex activities and selecting and paying for items when shopping. Discussion Higher tau levels are associated with the fastest decline in everyday functioning in the presence of elevated amyloid, and those accumulating more tau show a faster decline in everyday functioning. These findings demonstrate the utility of including sensitive measures of everyday functioning in clinical practice and clinical trials at the stage of preclinical AD. Trial registration information The A4 study, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02008357; and Longitudinal Evaluation of Amyloid Risk and Neurodegeneration, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02488720.

Key findings

Why it matters

Among 1,707 cognitively unimpaired older adults, those with elevated amyloid and the highest tau levels showed the largest decline in everyday functioning. The authors suggest that sensitive measures of daily functioning could be useful in clinical practice and trials at the preclinical stage.

Study details

How this study scored 68/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 65 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 68 of 100. Total 68 of 100.65 of the 96 points we could judge = 68 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 65 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 68 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 434 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 2 / 2 Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40440591)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 65 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 65 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 68 out of 100.
Total 68 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Dubbelman, M. A., Liu, A., Donohue, M. C., Langford, O., Raman, R., Rentz, D. M., et al. (2025). Changes in Daily Functioning in Association With Tau and Amyloid Among Unimpaired Older Adults With and Without Elevated Amyloid. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000213775

Vancouver

Dubbelman MA, Liu A, Donohue MC, Langford O, Raman R, Rentz DM, et al. Changes in Daily Functioning in Association With Tau and Amyloid Among Unimpaired Older Adults With and Without Elevated Amyloid. Neurology. 2025. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000213775. PMID: 40440591.

BibTeX

@article{dubbelman2025-40440591,
  author  = {Dubbelman, M. A. and Liu, A. and Donohue, M. C. and Langford, O. and Raman, R. and Rentz, D. M. and Amariglio, R. and Sperling, R. A. and others},
  title   = {{Changes in Daily Functioning in Association With Tau and Amyloid Among Unimpaired Older Adults With and Without Elevated Amyloid}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000213775},
  pmid    = {40440591},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000213775}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “phosphorylated”

732 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylated”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 732 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →