Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Digital health tools

Reviewed as evidence on: Everyday cognitive leisure (reading, puzzles, socialising, active vs passive sitting) and preserved cognition 4 studies (what the news said). Being listed means the study bears on the question, not that it agrees with the news.

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Importance Sedentary behavior is associated with cardiometabolic disease and mortality, but its association with dementia is unclear. Objective To investigate whether accelerometer-assessed sedentary behavior is associated with incident dementia. Design, setting, and participants A retrospective study of prospectively collected data from the UK Biobank including 49 841 adults aged 60 years or older without a diagnosis of dementia at the time of wearing the wrist accelerometer and living in England, Scotland, or Wales. Follow-up began at the time of wearing the accelerometer (February 2013 to December 2015) and continued until September 2021 in England, July 2021 in Scotland, and February 2018 in Wales. Exposures Mean daily sedentary behavior time (included in the primary analysis) and mean daily sedentary bout length, maximum daily sedentary bout length, and mean number of daily sedentary bouts (included in the secondary analyses) were derived from a machine learning-based analysis of 1 week of wrist-worn accelerometer data. Main outcome and measures Incident all-cause dementia diagnosis from inpatient hospital records and death registry data. Cox proportional hazard models with linear and cubic spline terms were used to assess associations. Results A total of 49 841 older adults (mean age, 67.19 [SD, 4.29] years; 54.7% were female) were followed up for a mean of 6.72 years (SD, 0.95 years). During this time, 414 individuals were diagnosed with incident all-cause dementia. In the fully adjusted models, there was a significant nonlinear association between time spent in sedentary behavior and incident dementia. Relative to a median of 9.27 hours/d for sedentary behavior, the hazard ratios (HRs) for dementia were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04-1.12, P Conclusions and relevance Among older adults, more time spent in sedentary behaviors was significantly associated with higher incidence of all-cause dementia. Future research is needed to determine whether the association between sedentary behavior and risk of dementia is causal.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Raichlen, D. A., Aslan, D. H., Sayre, M. K., Bharadwaj, P. K., Ally, M., Maltagliati, S., et al. (2023). Sedentary Behavior and Incident Dementia Among Older Adults. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.15231

Vancouver

Raichlen DA, Aslan DH, Sayre MK, Bharadwaj PK, Ally M, Maltagliati S, et al. Sedentary Behavior and Incident Dementia Among Older Adults. JAMA. 2023. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.15231. PMID: 37698563.

BibTeX

@article{raichlen2023-37698563,
  author  = {Raichlen, D. A. and Aslan, D. H. and Sayre, M. K. and Bharadwaj, P. K. and Ally, M. and Maltagliati, S. and Lai, M. H. C. and Wilcox, R. R. and others},
  title   = {{Sedentary Behavior and Incident Dementia Among Older Adults}},
  journal = {JAMA},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1001/jama.2023.15231},
  pmid    = {37698563},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.15231}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 49,841 older adults followed for a mean of 6.72 years, accelerometer-assessed sedentary behavior showed a significant nonlinear association with incident dementia. This is an observational association and does not show that changing sedentary behavior prevents or treats dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 10 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 63 of 100.63 of 100 points earned37 not earned

Published in a top-tier journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 10 / 10 Tier 1 — top-tier general journal (JAMA)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 JAMA: journal h-index 1,011 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 841 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 155 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 31.0 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 22.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 8 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 154 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Gene E. Alexander: h-index 80 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Southern California: institution h-index 1,521 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37698563)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

8 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “cognitive-leisure-and-cognitive-reserve”

4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-leisure-and-cognitive-reserve”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →