Application and comparison of classification algorithms for recognition of Alzheimer's disease in electrical brain activity (EEG)

Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment

The early detection of subjects with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for effective appliance of treatment strategies. Here we explored the ability of a multitude of linear and non-linear classification algorithms to discriminate between the electroencephalograms (EEGs) of patients with varying degree of AD and their age-matched control subjects. Absolute and relative spectral power, distribution of spectral power, and measures of spatial synchronization were calculated from recordings of resting eyes-closed continuous EEGs of 45 healthy controls, 116 patients with mild AD and 81 patients with moderate AD, recruited in two different centers (Stockholm, New York). The applied classification algorithms were: principal component linear discriminant analysis (PC LDA), partial least squares LDA (PLS LDA), principal component logistic regression (PC LR), partial least squares logistic regression (PLS LR), bagging, random forest, support vector machines (SVM) and feed-forward neural network. Based on 10-fold cross-validation runs it could be demonstrated that even tough modern computer-intensive classification algorithms such as random forests, SVM and neural networks show a slight superiority, more classical classification algorithms performed nearly equally well. Using random forests classification a considerable sensitivity of up to 85% and a specificity of 78%, respectively for the test of even only mild AD patients has been reached, whereas for the comparison of moderate AD vs. controls, using SVM and neural networks, values of 89% and 88% for sensitivity and specificity were achieved. Such a remarkable performance proves the value of these classification algorithms for clinical diagnostics.

Key findings

• Based on 10-fold cross-validation runs it could be demonstrated that even tough modern computer-intensive classification algorithms such as random forests, SVM and neural networks show a slight superiority, more classical classification algorithms performed nearly equally well.

New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →

Study details

• Participants116
• Evidence strengthLow

Read the original

• DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.023
• PubMed: 17156848
• Original source →

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

@article{lehmann2007-17156848,
  author  = {Lehmann, C. and Koenig, T. and Jelic, V. and Prichep, L. and John, R. E. and Wahlund, L. O. and Dodge, Y. and Dierks, T.},
  title   = {{Application and comparison of classification algorithms for recognition of Alzheimer's disease in electrical brain activity (EEG)}},
  journal = {Journal of neuroscience methods},
  year    = {2007},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.023},
  pmid    = {17156848},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.023}
}

Related studies in Digital health tools

• Application of machine learning in EEG-based dementia diagnosis: Classification and differential diagnosis Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · 2025-07-28 · usefulness score 43/100
• Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia: A Robust Classification Method of EEG Signals and a Comparison of Validation Methods Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021-08-09 · usefulness score 50/100
• Machine Learning Algorithms and Statistical Approaches for Alzheimer's Disease Analysis Based on Resting-State EEG Recordings: A Systematic Review International journal of neural systems · 2021-02-16 · usefulness score 55/100
• Deep learning-based EEG analysis to classify normal, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: Algorithms and dataset NeuroImage · 2023-03-29 · usefulness score 48/100
• Three-dimensional brain-on-a-chip with an interstitial level of flow and its application as an in vitro model of Alzheimer's disease Lab on a chip · 2015-01-01 · usefulness score 36/100
• Data mining methods in the prediction of Dementia: A real-data comparison of the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, neural networks, support vector machines, classification trees and random forests BMC research notes · 2011-08-17 · usefulness score 47/100

Similar studies

• Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment from multi-domain features of resting-state EEG 2020 · Prevention trials
• Information-Theoretic Geometry HCFIM features for data-limited EEG screening of Alzheimer’s disease and Frontotemporal Dementia 2026 · Brain scans and imaging
• Predictive EEG Signatures of Alzheimer's Disease: A Cross-Validated, Cross-Method Analysis Using ANCOVA Filtering and Sparse Logistic Regression 2026 · Brain scans and imaging
• Multivariate data analysis and machine learning in Alzheimer's disease with a focus on structural magnetic resonance imaging 2014 · Digital health tools
• Predicting conversion from MCI to AD using resting-state fMRI, graph theoretical approach and SVM 2017 · Digital health tools
• Machine learning framework for early MRI-based Alzheimer's conversion prediction in MCI subjects 2015 · Digital health tools

More on Digital health tools

• A review that covers this ground Assessment of digital EEG, quantitative EEG, and EEG brain mapping: report of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society [RETIRED] Neurology · 1997-07-01 · usefulness score 48/100
• Newest in this subject Speaker-Wise Dementia Screening fromNaturalistic Speech with Lexical Entropy, Semantic Drift, and Multimodal Fusion Research Square · 2026-10-21 · Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed · usefulness score 16/100
• Newest in this subject Integrating Multisource Target Evidence with Machine-Learning Potency Prediction for Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Discovery bioRxiv · 2026-10-20 · Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed · usefulness score 16/100

See all studies in Digital health tools →