Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Dementia is a condition that affects a very large population, and an effective clinical diagnosis can lead to early intervention to delay progressive cognitive decline. A relatively low-cost, noninvasive, and highly accessible biomarker measurement, electroencephalography (EEG), may be used for this purpose. Many EEG processing and classification methods, which are based on classical techniques, have been explored by researchers over the years. On the other hand, quantum machine learning (QML), which combines the concepts of quantum computing and machine learning, has recently gained much attention with the rising anticipation that this emerging research field may provide significant advantages over classical methods. This paper presents a healthy-dementia classification framework using synchrony features of CS-EMD decomposed EEGs and QML. In this study, three QML models, a variable quantum classifier (VQC), a quantum support vector machine (QSVM), and a quantum neural network (QNN) were explored. Their performance was evaluated through classification experiments using real EEG data. The performances of these QML methods, along with two popular classical classifiers (support vector machine and neural network), were compared. In our experiments, the quantum neural network outperformed all the other tested classifiers, reaching 96.58% accuracy, 97.11% specificity, 96.83% precision, 96.34% sensitivity, 96.28% F1 score, 97.69% AUC, an MCC of 0.9320, and a Kappa of 0.9268. Compared to the runner-up, a classical neural network, the QNN classifier shows an improvement by 8.92% in accuracy, 12.03% in specificity, 13.49% in precision, 5.57% in sensitivity, 10.29% in F1, 3.75% in AUC, 17.83% in MCC, and 18.90% in Kappa. The proposed framework, utilizing a quantum neural network, demonstrates effective classification of healthy individuals and dementia patients with high accuracy, showing good potential as a screening tool for dementia. Similar techniques may also be adapted for other biosignal analyses.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study used quantum machine learning on EEG signals to classify healthy versus dementia, with a quantum neural network reaching 96.58% accuracy. It is a classification method, not a treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 39 of 100.39 of 100 points earned61 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics: journal h-index 133 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 10 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 10 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author H. C. Wu: h-index 12 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Hong Kong: institution h-index 1,069 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Ho, R. H., Hung, K., Chui, K. T., Fu, Y., & Wu, H. C. (2025). EEG-Based Dementia Classification Using CS-EMD Synchrony Features and Quantum Machine Learning. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tce.2025.3548303

Vancouver

Ho RH, Hung K, Chui KT, Fu Y, Wu HC. EEG-Based Dementia Classification Using CS-EMD Synchrony Features and Quantum Machine Learning. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. 2025. doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3548303.

BibTeX

@article{ho2025-92003020,
  author  = {Ho, Raymond H. and Hung, Kevin and Chui, Kwok Tai and Fu, Yaru and Wu, H. C.},
  title   = {{EEG-Based Dementia Classification Using CS-EMD Synchrony Features and Quantum Machine Learning}},
  journal = {IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1109/tce.2025.3548303},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1109/tce.2025.3548303}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →