Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Neurological disorders are among the leading causes of both physical and cognitive disabilities worldwide, affecting approximately 15% of the global population. This study explores the use of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques in processing Electroencephalography (EEG) signals to detect various neurological disorders, including Epilepsy, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and Alzheimer’s disease. We present a detailed workflow that begins with EEG data acquisition using a headset, followed by data preprocessing with Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filters and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to eliminate noise and artifacts. Furthermore, the data is segmented, allowing the extraction of key features such as Bandpower and Shannon entropy, which improve classification accuracy. These features are stored in an offline database for easy access during analysis, to be then applied for both ML and DL models, systematically testing their performance and comparing the results to prior studies. Hence, our findings show impressive accuracy, with the random forest model achieving 99.85% accuracy in classifying autism vs. healthy subjects and 100% accuracy in distinguishing healthy individuals from those with dementia using Support Vector Machines (SVM). Moreover, deep learning models, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and ChronoNet, demonstrated accuracy rates ranging from 92.5% to 100%. In conclusion, this research highlights the effectiveness of ML and DL techniques in EEG signal processing, offering valuable contributions to the field of brain-computer interfaces and advancing the potential for more accurate neurological disease classification and diagnosis.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study used machine learning and deep learning on EEG signals to classify neurological disorders including dementia, reporting very high accuracy in distinguishing healthy individuals from those with dementia. It is a classification method, not a treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 51/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 51 of 100.51 of 100 points earned49 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (IEEE Access)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 IEEE Access: journal h-index 380 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 42 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 14.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 24.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 42 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Kais Bouallegue: h-index 14 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: institution h-index 2,511 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 51 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Khalfallah, S., Puech, W., Tlija, M., & Bouallegue, K. (2025). Exploring the Effectiveness of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for EEG Signal Classification in Neurological Disorders. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3532515

Vancouver

Khalfallah S, Puech W, Tlija M, Bouallegue K. Exploring the Effectiveness of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for EEG Signal Classification in Neurological Disorders. IEEE Access. 2025. doi:10.1109/access.2025.3532515.

BibTeX

@article{khalfallah2025-290cd850,
  author  = {Khalfallah, Souhaila and Puech, William and Tlija, Mehdi and Bouallegue, Kais},
  title   = {{Exploring the Effectiveness of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for EEG Signal Classification in Neurological Disorders}},
  journal = {IEEE Access},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1109/access.2025.3532515},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3532515}
}

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →