Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 72 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) ε4 genotype was the main risk factor for both ARIA types; ARIA-E incidence was further associated with treatment dose, affecting the 55% of ApoE ε4 carriers in the high-dose aducanumab treatment group. Conclusions and relevance Evidence suggests that ARIAs are frequent, mostly asymptomatic collateral events of amyloid-modifying therapies, highlighting the need for standardized clinical and neuroradiological management protocols in real-world clinical settings.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Filippi, M., Cecchetti, G., Spinelli, E. G., Vezzulli, P., Falini, A., & Agosta, F. (2022). Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities and β-Amyloid-Targeting Antibodies: A Systematic Review. JAMA neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5205

Vancouver

Filippi M, Cecchetti G, Spinelli EG, Vezzulli P, Falini A, Agosta F. Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities and β-Amyloid-Targeting Antibodies: A Systematic Review. JAMA neurology. 2022. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5205. PMID: 35099507.

BibTeX

@article{filippi2022-35099507,
  author  = {Filippi, M. and Cecchetti, G. and Spinelli, E. G. and Vezzulli, P. and Falini, A. and Agosta, F.},
  title   = {{Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities and β-Amyloid-Targeting Antibodies: A Systematic Review}},
  journal = {JAMA neurology},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5205},
  pmid    = {35099507},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5205}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review found that amyloid-related imaging abnormalities are common side effects of amyloid-targeting antibody treatments, and that APOE epsilon4 carriers were at highest risk, with 55% of epsilon4 carriers in the high-dose aducanumab group affected. It highlights the need for standardized monitoring, not a cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 72/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 72 of 100.72 of 100 points earned28 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for sample size because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA neurology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 JAMA Neurology: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 183 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 30.5 citations a year over 6 year(s) since 2022
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 18.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 19 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 145 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Federica Agosta: h-index 87 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele: institution h-index 731 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 35099507)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 72 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 13.

Later studies that cite this one

19 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →