Home › Research › Treatments
Opposing Regulation of Tau Condensation by Phosphorylation Levels and Molecular Chaperone Interactions
Morman C, Agarwal T, Ortigosa-Pascual L, Knowles TP, Abelein A.. bioRxiv, 2026-10-30
Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies
Aggregation of the microtubule-stabilizing protein Tau into insoluble deposits is characteristic for several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. While phosphorylated Tau (pTau) appears as a normal post-translational modification, the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated Tau aggregates represents a hallmark of these disorders. The molecular mechanisms involved in the conversion from functional Tau into pathological assemblies are still not elucidated. Here, we identified the role of phosphorylation levels on the phase separation and aggregation behavior of Tau, and how these processes can be counteracted by the molecular chaperone-like Bri2 BRICHOS domain. We found that the phosphorylation pattern modulates Tau fibrillation and enhances its droplet-formation propensity. Remarkably, Bri2 BRICHOS generally shifts Tau phase boundaries, counteracting the dense state, and inhibits Tau fibril formation, irrespectively of the degree of phosphorylation. Solution NMR results pinpointed the binding site of Bri2 BRICHOS on pTau, both in the dilute phase and droplet state, revealing an effect on specific regions and phosphorylated residues, which appear to be crucial for the formation and maintenance of the droplet state. Taken together, this study uncovered the opposing regulatory roles of phosphorylation and the anti-amyloid chaperone Bri2 BRICHOS on biomolecular condensation and fibrillation of Tau, providing detailed insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in tauopathies, which may facilitate future treatment strategies using chaperone-based inhibitors.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Morman, C., Agarwal, T., Ortigosa-Pascual, L., Knowles, T. P., & Abelein, A. (2026). Opposing Regulation of Tau Condensation by Phosphorylation Levels and Molecular Chaperone Interactions. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.27.762205
Vancouver
Morman C, Agarwal T, Ortigosa-Pascual L, Knowles TP, Abelein A. Opposing Regulation of Tau Condensation by Phosphorylation Levels and Molecular Chaperone Interactions. bioRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.10.27.762205.
BibTeX
@article{morman2026-fd4e94a3,
author = {Morman, C. and Agarwal, T. and Ortigosa-Pascual, L. and Knowles, T. P. and Abelein, A.},
title = {{Opposing Regulation of Tau Condensation by Phosphorylation Levels and Molecular Chaperone Interactions}},
journal = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.27.762205},
url = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.27.762205}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- We found that the phosphorylation pattern modulates Tau fibrillation and enhances its droplet-formation propensity.
- Solution NMR results pinpointed the binding site of Bri2 BRICHOS on pTau, both in the dilute phase and droplet state, revealing an effect on specific regions and phosphorylated residues, which appear to be crucial for the formation and maintenance of the droplet state.
- Taken together, this study uncovered the opposing regulatory roles of phosphorylation and the anti-amyloid chaperone Bri2 BRICHOS on biomolecular condensation and fibrillation of Tau, providing detailed insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in tauopathies, which may facilitate future treatment strategies using chaperone-based inhibitors.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 16/100
Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (bioRxiv) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 4 / 10 | Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 13 / 62 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100. |
| Total | 21 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Treatments from nearby years
Also tagged “phosphorylation”
388 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylation”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 388 tagged studies.