27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
This study examines the impact of progressive degeneration of conceptual knowledge on the content words used in connected speech elicited using the Cookie Theft picture description (Goodglass & Kaplan. 1983). 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE ε4) is associated with an additional risk for AD. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 240 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD; LOAD) is the most common human neurodegenerative disease, however, the availability and efficacy of disease-modifying interventions is severely lacking. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) measures global cognitive performance and is often used as a screening test for dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The impact of cognitive impairment on activities of daily living (ADL) is being used as a major criterion for differentiating between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 45 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The mean (SD) age of the 4,631 participants was 67.6 (4.89) years, and 2579 (55.7%) were women. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,943 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The sample (n = 26,728) was equally distributed across gender (55.1% women) and education (50.8% completed HS/GED diploma), and 30% came from under-represented racial/ethnic groups. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 26,728 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
= 0.81). NfL levels were not significantly associated with GDS-15 in a population of community-dwelling older adults without dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 512 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
< 0.001). This study suggests 2 molecular pathways underlying CAA, with a larger effect size for the pathway including SFRP1 and APOE protein and C-terminally truncated Aβ before position 40. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This cross-sectional study examines lecanemeb update among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment and evaluates whether there are disparities among potentially eligible patients. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Four thousand four hundred eighty-six participants were included (mean age 71.3 ± 4.7 years, 30% participants Aβ+, 59% female). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The family caregivers of PwD exhibited a fair QoL, with a score of 29.01 ± 4.059. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 150 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The prevalence of caregiver burden was 28.9%. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 602 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Lower SES and education were the strongest predictors of increased behavioral risk. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,730 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
When risk factors were evaluated independently, we found less early-life education, mid-life hearing loss and diabetes, and late-life social isolation and visual loss associated with increased odds for dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 5,526 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Functional impairment increased progressively from normal cognition to dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,445 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Early-stage DLB closely resembles PD in motor symptoms but has more neuropsychiatric non-motor symptoms compared to PD and overall non-motor symptoms than AD. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 107 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cross-sectional studies suggest a limited relationship between accelerated epigenetic aging derived from epigenetic clocks, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology or risk. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 101 FTD patients (64 ± 8 years, 53 men), 230 AD patients (65 ± 10 years, 84 men), and 173 CTR (59 ± 15 years, 67 men) were studied. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 101 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We included 3074 AD patients (mean age 78.1 years; 59.4% women), of whom 1028 used statins (79.6% simvastatin, 20.4% atorvastatin). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 3,074 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Secondary outcomes included plan- and county-level factors associated with offering this benefit in 2025, estimated using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression with county-level random intercepts. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cardiac 123I-MIBG findings are similar among idiopathic RBD and the syndromes of PD and DLB, but differ from those of PSP and MSA. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 95 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among older adults, MeDi adherence was associated with less brain atrophy, with an effect similar to 5 years of aging. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Dementia is a major global health challenge, as its burden on society will increase with population aging. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Adherence to the MIND diet was associated with better cognitive function at baseline and over 8 years of follow-up; however, MIND diet was not associated with 8-year cognitive trajectory. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →