Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

= 0.81). NfL levels were not significantly associated with GDS-15 in a population of community-dwelling older adults without dementia. Although no significant CDR-NfL interaction was detected, exploratory analyses suggest that plasma NfL might be associated with GDS-15 scores only among people with a CDR 0.5 (indicative of mild cognitive impairment). Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to elucidate the potential biological differences in depressive symptoms across different cognitive statuses. Highlights: Plasma neurofilament light (NfL) levels might be associated with 15-Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) scores only among people with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) 0.5 (indicative of mild cognitive impairment [MCI]), but not among those with CDR 0 (normal cognition).Depressive symptoms arising in the context of cognitive impairment may represent a distinct clinical entity compared to those observed in individuals with normal cognitive functioning.Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to elucidate potential biological differences in depressive symptoms across varying cognitive statuses (unimpaired cognition, MCI, and dementia).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Bellelli, F., Raffin, J., Angioni, D., Romana, J., Soto, M., Delrieu, J., et al. (2025). The relationship between neurofilament light chain and depressive symptoms according to cognitive status. Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70048

Vancouver

Bellelli F, Raffin J, Angioni D, Romana J, Soto M, Delrieu J, et al. The relationship between neurofilament light chain and depressive symptoms according to cognitive status. Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions. 2025. doi:10.1002/trc2.70048. PMID: 40352263.

BibTeX

@article{bellelli2025-40352263,
  author  = {Bellelli, Federico and Raffin, Jérémy and Angioni, Davide and Romana, Julie and Soto, María and Delrieu, Julien and Barreto, Philipe De Souto and {MAPT/DSA study group}},
  title   = {{The relationship between neurofilament light chain and depressive symptoms according to cognitive status}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia Translational Research \& Clinical Interventions},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/trc2.70048},
  pmid    = {40352263},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70048}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Plasma NfL was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms in community-dwelling older adults without dementia, with only exploratory signals in those with mild cognitive impairment. This is a cross-sectional finding and does not inform treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 50/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 48 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 50 of 100. Total 50 of 100.48 of the 96 points we could judge = 50 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 48 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 50 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions: journal h-index 84 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 512 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Inserm: institution h-index 1,988 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40352263)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 48 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 48 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 50 out of 100.
Total 50 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “biomarkers”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biomarkers”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →